·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

From a bilateral drill in 1992 to a four-nation exercise, MALABAR mirrors the evolution of India's maritime strategy. Discuss.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Evolution of the exercise
  2. How it mirrors India's maritime strategy
  3. Limits of the mirror

MALABAR began in 1992 as a bilateral Indian Navy–US Navy exercise [2]. Its 2026 edition at Yokosuka, Japan, brings together India, Japan, the US and Australia [1]. The exercise has grown in partners, reach and complexity, and that growth tracks India's move from a cautious, home-waters posture to an outward-looking Indo-Pacific strategy.

Evolution of the exercise

  • Partners: It started as a bilateral India–US drill. Japan joined in 2015 [4]. India itself announced Australia's participation in 2020 [3]. All four Quad navies now take part.
  • Geography: In 2020 India hosted it in the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea [4]. The 2023 edition was off Sydney [2], and the 2026 edition is in the Western Pacific [1].
  • Complexity: The 2020 edition included dual-carrier operations and anti-submarine warfare [4]. The current format runs a harbour phase for joint planning, then a sea phase, to build interoperability [1].

How it mirrors India's maritime strategy

  • Strategic outlook: India has moved from Cold War-era distance from the US to issue-based partnerships built around a "secure and stable Indo-Pacific" [1]. MALABAR puts the Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative into practice.
  • Policy vision: Sending a ship to Japan fits MAHASAGAR, India's vision of security and growth "Across Regions" [1].
  • Indigenisation: The indigenous stealth frigate INS Sahyadri deployed with INS Kolkata in 2023 [2] and again in 2026 [1]. This shows Aatmanirbharta in warship-building.
  • Strategic autonomy: There is no treaty commitment. In 2020 India held the exercise in a "non-contact, at sea only" format [3], which shows it still sets the terms.

Limits of the mirror

  • Alliance perception: The participants are the same four countries as the Quad. Critics therefore read MALABAR as a coalition aimed at one rival power, and "partner" begins to look like "ally".
  • Capacity gap: In 2012 the Defence Acquisition Council approved 198 ships and submarines, but the Navy then had 127 ships and 15 submarines [5]. Sending an Eastern Fleet frigate away for weeks [1] stretches India's presence in the Indian Ocean.

Overall, MALABAR's growth from a bilateral drill into a four-navy Western Pacific exercise reflects India's shift into a confident Indo-Pacific maritime power. Looking ahead, India should deliver indigenous warships faster to close the gap in ship numbers [5]. It should also keep the format flexible and use the common procedures for disaster response in the Indian Ocean. That way India can widen its reach while keeping strategic autonomy and the IPOI's vision of an open, rules-based Indo-Pacific.

Sources

  1. 1PIB: INS Sahyadri arrives at Yokosuka Naval Base, Japan for Exercise MALABAR 2026 (Nov 2026)2026 venue and participants, harbour and sea phases, interoperability, "secure and stable Indo-Pacific", MAHASAGAR, Eastern Fleet, indigenous frigate
  2. 2PIB, Ministry of Defence: INS Sahyadri and INS Kolkata to participate in Exercise MALABAR 2023origin in 1992 as a bilateral drill, 2023 edition off Sydney, indigenous warships
  3. 3PIB, Ministry of Defence: MALABAR-20 (Oct 2020)India announced Australia's participation; "non-contact, at sea only" format
  4. 4Indian Navy / PIB: Exercise MALABAR 2020 Concludes in Arabian SeaIndia hosted the 2020 edition in the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea; Japan joined in 2015; dual-carrier and anti-submarine operations
  5. 5Standing Committee on Defence (16th Lok Sabha), 4th Report – Demands for Grants 2014-15DAC's approved force of 198 ships and submarines vs actual fleet of 127 ships and 15 submarines

More from this note