·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

How can the counter-magnet strategy help reduce regional imbalance and metropolitan congestion? Illustrate with recent examples.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Easing metropolitan congestion
  2. Reducing regional imbalance
  3. Recent examples
  4. Limitations

A counter-magnet is a city outside a metropolitan region that is developed to take in migrants who would otherwise move to the metro, and to drive growth in its own surrounding region. The NCR Planning Board identified Counter Magnet Areas (CMAs) such as Gwalior, Hisar, Bareilly, Kota and Patiala for this dual role [1]. If these cities get both jobs and good living conditions, they can ease pressure on the metro and spread growth to other regions.

Easing metropolitan congestion

  • Intercepting migration: jobs in CMAs absorb workers from less-developed belts who would otherwise move into the NCR [1].
  • Reducing pressure on the core city: when industry moves to cheaper land in CMAs, demand for housing, transport and services in Delhi falls.

Reducing regional imbalance

  • Growth pole for lagging regions: Gwalior's Telecom Manufacturing Zone (TMZ) is planned as a growth driver for Gwalior-Chambal, a historically less-industrialised region [2].
  • Local skilled jobs: the MoU estimates about 14,000 direct jobs, which reduces distress migration [3].
  • Cooperative federalism: the Centre funds 100% of Phase-I (₹493 crore), Madhya Pradesh gives about 170 acres free of cost, and a joint SPV (51:49) builds the zone [2][3].

Recent examples

  • Gwalior TMZ (2026): a plug-and-play telecom cluster at the Shrimant Madhavrao Scindia Counter Magnet City. Investment proposals exceed ₹5,500 crore, with 18,000+ potential jobs [2]. Investors were brought in through roadshows, including the one in Mumbai [4].
  • EMC 2.0: MeitY's electronics clusters are spread across 10 States, which takes manufacturing beyond the big metros [5].

Limitations

  • Promised vs actual investment: EMC 2.0 has actually invested only ₹12,569.69 crore and created 13,680 jobs, against about 1.80 lakh jobs estimated [5].
  • Idle land: the CAG found operations on only 62.42% of notified SEZ land [6]. Free land invites firms to hold it without building.
  • Weak urban services: without housing, transport and social infrastructure, CMAs cannot keep their talent.

Counter-magnets work only when they offer both jobs and a good place to live. To get there:

  • Link anchor industries like the TMZ with skilling, housing and transport connectivity.
  • Add build-or-return clauses to land leases.
  • Publish how much of the promised investment has actually been spent.

Done this way, the strategy can turn Gwalior-type cities into self-sustaining growth centres. It would also advance Article 38(2), which asks the State to reduce inequalities between regions, and SDG 11 on sustainable cities.

Sources

  1. 1NCR Planning Board, Annual Report 2020-21CMAs (Gwalior, Hisar, Bareilly, Kota, Patiala); their dual role of intercepting migration and acting as regional growth centres
  2. 2PIB, "Union Minister for Communications and DoNER Shri Jyotiraditya Scindia's Vision and Sustained Efforts Set the Stage for a New Industrial Era in Gwalior" (6 Oct 2026)Counter Magnet City site; ₹5,500 crore+ proposals; 18,000+ jobs; Gwalior-Chambal growth; SPV 51:49; 170 acres free
  3. 3PIB, "Department of Telecommunications Signs MoU with Government of Madhya Pradesh for Establishment of Telecom Manufacturing Zone (TMZ) in Gwalior"₹493 crore for Phase-I; 170 acres free; about 14,000 jobs
  4. 4PIB, "Union Minister of Communications… jointly chair investor and strategic roundtables in Mumbai… India's First Telecom Manufacturing Zone (TMZ)"Mumbai investor roadshow
  5. 5PIB, "Modified Electronics Manufacturing Clusters (EMC 2.0) estimated to generate approx. 1.80 lakh jobs"clusters in 10 States; ₹12,569.69 crore actually invested; 13,680 jobs vs 1.80 lakh
  6. 6CAG, Performance Audit of Special Economic Zones, Report No. 21 of 2014operations on only 62.42% of notified SEZ land

More from this note