·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolity

Child marriage remains a persistent challenge despite legal prohibition. Analyse the socio-legal factors responsible and suggest measures for effective enforcement of the PCMA, 2006.

In this answer
  1. Social factors
  2. Legal and institutional factors
  3. Way forward

NFHS-5 (2019-21) records that 23.3% of women aged 20-24 were married before 18 [1], though the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 fixes 18 years for females and 21 for males [2]. The persistence reflects a gap between statutory command and social practice, compounded by enforcement design flaws.

Social factors

  • Poverty and dowry economics: younger brides attract lower dowry; daughters are treated as an economic burden — prevalence is concentrated in the poorest, rural, least-educated households [1].
  • Patriarchal control of sexuality: early marriage is used to secure "honour" and pre-empt adolescent choice.
  • Educational discontinuity: dropout at the secondary stage removes the strongest protective factor against early marriage [1].
  • Custom and collective solemnisation: mass-marriage occasions normalise the practice and diffuse individual accountability.

Legal and institutional factors

  • Voidable, not void: a child marriage stands unless annulled within two years of attaining majority [2] — a window rarely used by a dependent bride.
  • Personal-law conflict: the claim that puberty confers marriageable capacity produced divergent High Court views; the Allahabad High Court (2026) held PCMA and POCSO apply to every citizen irrespective of religion [5].
  • Weak machinery: the Act creates Child Marriage Prohibition Officers [2], but the post is typically an added charge on district officials, diluting focus; absent universal marriage registration, cases surface only after solemnisation.
  • Pending reform: the Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021 — raising the female age to 21 and the annulment window to five years — awaits Parliamentary Standing Committee closure [3].

Way forward

  • Declare such marriages void ab initio and enact the pending Bill's extended annulment period [3].
  • Make marriage registration compulsory with age verification, and appoint full-time, funded CMPOs.
  • Scale the Bal Vivah Mukt Bharat portal for citizen reporting and converge it with school-retention and cash-transfer schemes [4].
  • Engage panchayats, qazis and priests to refuse solemnisation.

Child marriage is finally a development problem wearing a legal mask. Coupling stricter enforcement with girls' education and income security — the approach behind India's 2030 child-marriage-free goal [4] — best advances Article 21 and SDG 5.3.

Sources

  1. 1Child Marriage in India: Key Insights from NFHS-5, UNFPA India23.3% prevalence; poverty, rural and education gradients
  2. 2The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 (India Code)minimum ages, voidable marriage, two-year annulment window, Child Marriage Prohibition Officers
  3. 3The Prohibition of Child Marriage (Amendment) Bill, 2021, PRS Legislative Researchfemale age of 21, five-year annulment window, pending before Standing Committee
  4. 4Bal Vivah Mukt Bharat, Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Women and Child Developmentcampaign, reporting portal, child-marriage-free-by-2030 goal
  5. 5Allahabad High Court, judgment of 1 July 2026 (Division Bench of Justices J.J. Munir and Achal Sachdev) — PCMA and POCSO apply to all citizens irrespective of religion
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity