·PIB·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEconomyS&T

Civil nuclear liability has historically been a barrier to foreign investment in India's nuclear sector. Critically analyse how the SHANTI Act, 2025 addresses this.

In this answer
  1. How the Act addresses the liability barrier
  2. Critical assessment — limits that persist

The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010 granted operators a right of recourse against suppliers of defective equipment — a departure from global practice that deterred foreign reactor vendors for over a decade. The SHANTI Act, 2025, which received Presidential assent on 21 December 2025 and repeals both the CLNDA, 2010 and the Atomic Energy Act, 1962, seeks to remove this bottleneck [3].

How the Act addresses the liability barrier

  • Supplier liability removed: the Act withdraws the right of recourse on grounds of defective equipment or material, channelling liability to the operator and aligning India with international conventions [3].
  • Graded, predictable liability: against the CLNDA's flat ₹1,500 crore ceiling, operator liability is now tiered by installed capacity — ₹100 crore for small and fuel-cycle facilities up to ₹3,000 crore above 3,600 MW — enabling accurate insurance pricing [3].
  • Overall cap defined: total liability per incident is capped at the rupee equivalent of 300 million SDR, giving investors an outer limit [1].
  • Regulatory certainty: the AERB gains statutory status, and private or joint-venture entities may build, own and operate plants under a Central Government licence plus AERB safety authorisation [2].

Critical assessment — limits that persist

  • Rules not yet notified: as of July 2026 subordinate rules remain in the drafting stage, so no private licence has been issued — reform on paper precedes reform on ground [1].
  • Foreign equity restricted: licences are barred to companies incorporated outside India, so foreign firms enter only as suppliers or minority partners [3].
  • Sovereign carve-outs: enrichment, heavy-water production and spent-fuel management stay exclusively with the Government, limiting full-cycle commercial entry [2].
  • Diluted supplier accountability also raises victim-compensation and safety-incentive concerns, requiring a robust insurance pool.

The Act therefore resolves the legal deterrent while leaving the operational one intact. Swift notification of rules, a deepened nuclear insurance pool and calibrated foreign-equity liberalisation would convert this statutory promise into investment, advancing India's 100 GW-by-2047 goal and its net-zero commitment.

Sources

  1. 1PIB — Parliament Question: Private Sector Participation in Nuclear Energy (23 July 2026)rules still in drafting stage; 300 million SDR overall cap; operator liability tiers
  2. 2PIB — The Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India (SHANTI) Bill, 2025private participation scope, licence plus AERB safety authorisation, government-reserved fuel-cycle activities
  3. 3PRS Legislative Research — Bill Summary, SHANTI Bill, 2025repeal of AEA 1962 and CLNDA 2010, removal of right of recourse, ₹100–3,000 crore tiers against the earlier ₹1,500 crore cap, bar on foreign-incorporated companies
Practice
11 questions on this item
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity