·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Compare scrappage and retrofitment as routes to cleaner vehicle fleets in a circular economy.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Scrappage: recycling the vehicle
  2. Retrofitment: reusing the vehicle
  3. Comparative assessment
  4. Way forward

India's end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) could rise from about 23 million in 2025 to nearly 50 million by 2030 [1]. There are two circular routes for these vehicles. Scrappage recovers materials from the old vehicle. Retrofitment keeps the vehicle and replaces its combustion powertrain with a certified electric kit. The two routes work best together; they are not rivals.

Scrappage: recycling the vehicle

  • Legal base: The Vehicle Scrapping Facility Rules, 2021, framed under the MV Act, 1988 and CMVR, 1989, set up Registered Vehicle Scrapping Facilities (RVSFs) [2].
  • Circularity: Steel, aluminium and plastics are recovered. NITI Aayog wants uniform State concessions against a Certificate of Deposit (CoD), with de-registration only after a valid CoD is submitted [1].
  • Limits: Every replacement means building a new vehicle. That adds fresh manufacturing emissions and a high capital cost for small fleet owners.

Retrofitment: reusing the vehicle

  • Legal base: Rule 115D, CMVR allows hybrid or electric kits that comply with AIS-123 [3].
  • Circularity: The body and chassis are kept, which is "reuse", a higher rung than "recycle". Example: the ARAI-tested RetroKit for auto-rickshaws, backed by TDB-DST [4].
  • Limits: Type approval covers one kit on one vehicle model. It can be extended only to models within 15% gross vehicle weight, and only installers authorised by the kit maker may fit kits [3]. This slows scaling and keeps control with kit makers.

Comparative assessment

Parameter Scrappage Retrofitment
Circular rung Recycle Reuse, extends vehicle life
Emissions Removes the polluter, but a new build adds emissions Avoids new-build emissions
Owner's cost Full new-vehicle purchase Kit cost only; best value in heavy vehicles
Fiscal support CoD-linked concessions [1] None under FAME II [5]; PM E-DRIVE (₹10,900 crore) funds new EVs [6]
Best fit Unsafe, very old vehicles; two-wheelers and cars Buses, trucks, three-wheeler fleets

Way forward

  • A "retrofit certificate" carrying road-tax benefits equal to the CoD, so the two policies do not compete.
  • Platform-wide type approval for vehicles sharing a chassis, plus a public registry of approved kits and installers.
  • A dedicated PM E-DRIVE window for bus and truck retrofits.

Scrappage closes the material loop, while retrofitment slows it by extending asset life. A policy that sorts vehicles by segment, scrapping the unsafe and retrofitting the robust, can clean fleets at lower cost and fit India's broader e-mobility push. It would also advance SDG 12 (responsible consumption) and India's Net Zero 2070 commitment.

Sources

  1. 1NITI Aayog, *Enhancing Circular Economy of End-of-Life Vehicles (ELVs) in India* (January 2026): ELV projections; uniform CoD concessions; de-registration only after a valid CoD
  2. 2Rajya Sabha, Parliament Question 265 (31 July 2024), MoRTH reply: RVSF Rules, 2021 notified under the MV Act, 1988 and CMVR, 1989
  3. 3AIS-123 (Part 2): CMVR Type Approval of Hybrid Electric System Retrofitment (ARAI/MoRTH): model-specific type approval; 15% GVW extension limit; only kit-maker-authorised installers
  4. 4Technology Development Board (DST): support to Electromotion E-Vidyut Vehicles, Raipur: ARAI-tested RetroKit for auto-rickshaws
  5. 5NITI Aayog, *Status Quo Analysis of Various Segments of Electric Mobility*: no FAME II incentive for retrofitment or scrappage
  6. 6PM India: Cabinet approves PM E-DRIVE Scheme with an outlay of ₹10,900 crore over two years: PM E-DRIVE outlay and its focus on new EVs

More from this note