·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsEconomyIRDefence

Critically examine the impact of U.S. tariff policy under 'flexible realism' on India's export competitiveness and trade negotiation strategy.

In this answer
  1. Adverse impact on export competitiveness
  2. Offsetting gains
  3. Recalibrated negotiation strategy

The U.S.-India COMPACT (February 2025) and the February 2026 interim trade deal bookend a phase in which Washington deployed tariffs as statecraft — judging partners by tangible value rather than shared values [1][2]. This transactional turn has both squeezed and sharpened India's trade posture.

Adverse impact on export competitiveness

  • Tariff shock: reciprocal duties peaking at 50% struck labour-intensive, thin-margin exports — textiles, leather, gems and jewellery, engineering goods [3].
  • Uncertainty premium: swings from 25%/50% to 18% disrupt long-term contracting; with India's exports to the U.S. at $86.35 billion (2024), volatility is systemic, not marginal [3].
  • Asymmetric leverage: Washington cited India's 17% average applied tariff against its own 3.3% (agriculture 39% vs 5%) to justify pressure [1].
  • Non-trade linkage: tying duties to India's Russian oil purchases subordinated commerce to strategic compliance [2].

Offsetting gains

  • The interim deal cut the reciprocal tariff to 18%; duties on $30.94 billion of exports fell from 50% to 18% and on a further $10.03 billion to zero [3].
  • Relative advantage emerged as competitors faced higher walls — China 35%, Vietnam and Bangladesh 20% — improving India's price positioning [3].

Recalibrated negotiation strategy

  • Shift from WTO-centric multilateral advocacy to sequenced bilateralism — an interim tranche first, the full Bilateral Trade Agreement still under negotiation [1][2].
  • Calibrated concessions: tariff relief on U.S. industrial goods and non-sensitive agriculture (distillers' grains, sorghum, tree nuts, soybean oil, wine and spirits) while shielding farmers, MSMEs and dairy [2][3].
  • Residual vulnerability: India's concessions are locked in, while U.S. tariffs remain revocable executive instruments under domestic trade law rather than binding multilateral commitments.

On balance, flexible realism has been both shock and spur: it exposed India's export concentration yet extracted a workable bargain. Durable insulation lies in deepening manufacturing competitiveness, widening India's FTA network, and building the defence-technology capabilities that make partnership indispensable rather than merely convenient.

Sources

  1. 1USTR Fact Sheet: U.S. and India Establish Terms of Reference for Bilateral Trade Agreement (April 2025)COMPACT initiative, BTA roadmap, comparative applied tariff rates (17% vs 3.3%; agri 39% vs 5%)
  2. 2The White House, Fact Sheet: The United States and India Announce Historic Trade Deal (February 2026)reciprocal tariff cut 25% → 18%, Russian oil linkage, India's industrial and agricultural tariff commitments
  3. 3PIB, "India Achieves Landmark Trade Victory, Unlocks $30-Trillion U.S. Market" (February 2026)$30.94 bn of exports at 50%→18% and $10.03 bn to zero duty; $86.35 bn exports (2024); competitor tariffs (China 35%, Vietnam/Bangladesh 20%); safeguards for farmers and MSMEs
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Economy