·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsS&T

"Deforestation not only destroys biodiversity but also undermines a forest's climate-regulating functions." Critically analyse in the context of the Amazon.

In this answer
  1. Biodiversity destruction
  2. Climate-regulating functions undermined
  3. Critical assessment

The Amazon is both the planet's richest species pool and a major regulator of carbon and rainfall. Satellite monitoring by Brazil's INPE (PRODES, running since 1988) shows sustained clearing for pasture and cropland [1]. The statement holds — but the two losses differ in scale and reversibility.

Biodiversity destruction

  • Tropical forests accounted for over 90% of global deforestation between 2000 and 2018, with South American pasture expansion a leading driver [2].
  • Loss is not only of species but of ecological function — pollinators, seed dispersers and habitat continuity fragment with the canopy.
  • Regrowth does not restore diversity. A 2026 Global Change Biology study finds Amazonian secondary forests are extremely hyperdominant: roughly 16–25 species (~3.6–5.6%) supply over half of all stems and carbon, with Cecropia palmata, Inga alba, Annona exsucca and Tapirira guianensis forming a recurring core [3].

Climate-regulating functions undermined

  • Forests are a carbon sink; clearing converts stored biomass into emissions and erodes the global land sink [4].
  • Beyond carbon, forests regulate climate biophysically — through evapotranspiration, rainfall recycling and albedo — so Amazon loss threatens regional precipitation far beyond the cleared plot [4].
  • Degradation risks a savannisation tipping point, weakening the biome's self-sustaining moisture cycle [4].

Critical assessment

  • The two harms are asymmetric: fast-growing pioneers let secondary forests recapture carbon within decades, but species composition stays narrow — carbon recovery is not biodiversity recovery [3].
  • Yet hyperdominance is also an opportunity: a small, identifiable species set makes native-species restoration cheaper and more targeted [3].
  • Monitoring capacity (PRODES) is strong; the binding constraint is enforcement and land tenure, not data [1].

Deforestation therefore inflicts a double injury — irreversible biodiversity loss alongside partly recoverable climate services. The way forward lies in halting primary-forest clearing while scaling science-led regrowth using known pioneer species, financed through carbon markets and NDC commitments. India's revised Green India Mission reflects the same restoration logic [5], advancing SDG 13 and SDG 15.

Sources

  1. 1TerraBrasilis – PRODES/DETER deforestation monitoring, INPEsatellite monitoring of Brazilian Amazon deforestation since 1988; data-strong governance
  2. 2FAO, The State of the World's Forests 2024tropical forests >90% of global deforestation, 2000–2018; grazing-driven clearing in South America
  3. 3Elias et al., "Hyperdominance and Rarity in Amazonian Secondary Forests", *Global Change Biology* (2026), doi:10.1111/gcb.7097016–25 species supply >50% of abundance and carbon; named core pioneer species; restoration implications
  4. 4IPCC AR6 WG-II, Cross-Chapter Paper 7: Tropical Forestsforest carbon sink, evapotranspiration/albedo regulation, tipping-point risk
  5. 5PIB, National Mission for a Green India, MoEFCCIndia's forest restoration and afforestation framework

More from this note

More on S&T