·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Despite near-universal statistical coverage of basic amenities under UDISE+, rural government schools continue to report infrastructural neglect. Examine the reasons for this disconnect between data and ground reality.

In this answer
  1. Design of the indicator: presence, not functionality
  2. Aggregation masks disparity
  3. Creation-heavy funding, maintenance-light delivery
  4. Accountability vacuum

UDISE+ 2024-25 records 99.3% of schools with drinking water, 97.3% with girls' toilets and 93.6% with electricity [1], yet field reports from Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra describe missing boundary walls, unusable bathrooms and worn blackboards [4]. The disconnect arises less from false data than from what UDISE+ measures and who delivers on the ground.

Design of the indicator: presence, not functionality

  • Coverage is captured largely as binary availability — a toilet reported as "available" need not be water-connected, clean or in use.
  • Entries are self-reported by school heads, without routine independent physical audit.
  • Several RTE Schedule norms — boundary wall, blackboard, playground, barrier-free access [3] — do not appear among headline indicators, so their absence is statistically invisible.

Aggregation masks disparity

  • National averages hide intra-State variation; even a 6% shortfall in electricity spans tens of thousands of rural and tribal-belt schools [1].
  • Illustratively, a government middle school in Sehore district (MP) functions from a dilapidated building shared with the panchayat office and community ground [4].

Creation-heavy funding, maintenance-light delivery

  • Samagra Shiksha allocates against gaps identified from UDISE+ and State proposals [2]; once an asset is "created", it exits the gap list, while recurring repair and upkeep remain thinly financed.
  • Education being a Concurrent List subject, construction and maintenance rest with States and panchayats, where technical capacity, land and convergence are weakest.

Accountability vacuum

  • Weak School Management Committee oversight has pushed citizens to act — the "School Thik Karo" campaign launched from Hingoli, Maharashtra, in August 2026 petitions sarpanchs directly [4].

The gap is therefore one of measurement and maintenance, not of intent. Shifting UDISE+ towards functionality-based, third-party-verified indicators, ring-fencing maintenance within Samagra Shiksha and Finance Commission grants to local bodies, and reviving SMC social audits can align statistics with classrooms — making Article 21A's promise of quality schooling, and NEP 2020's foundational-learning goals, real for the rural child.

Sources

  1. 1Ministry of Education, UDISE+ 2024-25 Report, PIBtoilet, drinking water, electricity and handwashing coverage percentages
  2. 2Samagra Shiksha Scheme to improve access, infrastructure and quality of education, PIBscheme design, RTE alignment and gap-based funding to States/UTs
  3. 3Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (Schedule), India Codemandated norms: all-weather building, separate toilets, playground, barrier-free access
  4. 4Missing: boundary walls, bathrooms, blackboards, The Hindu, 5 September 2026multi-State ground report; Sehore school example; "School Thik Karo" campaign

More from this note