·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Discuss the effectiveness of Samagra Shiksha in bridging infrastructural gaps in rural government schools. What structural reforms are needed to improve last-mile implementation?

In this answer
  1. Where it has worked
  2. Where it falls short
  3. Structural reforms needed

Samagra Shiksha, launched in 2018 by subsuming SSA, RMSA and Teacher Education, is the nodal Centrally Sponsored Scheme financing the RTE Act, 2009 infrastructure mandate — all-weather buildings, separate toilets, drinking water, barrier-free access [4]. Its rural record shows statistical saturation coexisting with ground-level neglect.

Where it has worked

  • Integration and scale: a single scheme from pre-school to Class XII, outlay of about ₹2.94 lakh crore (2021-26), delivered through one State Implementation Society, reducing fragmentation [1]
  • Near-universal basic amenities: UDISE+ 2024-25 records 99.3% drinking water, 97.3% girls' toilets, 96.2% boys' toilets, 93.6% electricity [2]
  • Evidence-based allocation: funding gaps derived from UDISE+ data plus State proposals; girls' toilets aid retention after puberty [1]
  • Digital deepening: computer access rose to 64.7% and internet to 63.5% [2]

Where it falls short

  • Averages mask disparity: ground reports from Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra document dilapidated buildings, missing boundary walls and unusable bathrooms [3]
  • Availability ≠ functionality: data captures existence of an asset, not its working condition or upkeep
  • Blind spots: boundary walls are not separately tracked, and ramps/handrails cover only 54.9% of schools [2]
  • Staffing distortions: one middle school reported 10 teachers for 283 students, against RTE pupil-teacher norms [3]
  • Last-mile execution rests with States and panchayats; central release does not ensure construction, leaving citizen campaigns such as "School Thik Karo" (2026) to fill the accountability vacuum [3]

Structural reforms needed

  • Shift UDISE+ reporting from availability to functionality, verified by third-party and social audits
  • Add boundary-wall and maintenance indicators; geo-tagged, photo-verified asset registers
  • Untied maintenance grants to School Management Committees and panchayats through Finance Commission local-body funds (Article 243G)
  • Outcome-linked release of instalments and time-bound filling of teacher vacancies

Samagra Shiksha has largely solved provision; the residual challenge is upkeep and accountability. Financing maintenance, not merely construction, and aligning the scheme with NEP 2020's foundational-learning goals and SDG-4 would let Article 21-A translate into dignified classrooms.

Sources

  1. 1Samagra Shiksha — About the Scheme, Ministry of Education2018 merger of SSA/RMSA/TE, ₹2.94 lakh crore outlay, single State Implementation Society, UDISE+-based gap funding
  2. 2UDISE+ 2024-25 Report, Ministry of Education (PIB)toilet, drinking water, electricity, ramp, computer and internet coverage figures
  3. 3The Hindu, "Missing: boundary walls, bathrooms, blackboards" (5 September 2026)multi-State ground reporting on dilapidated schools, teacher shortages, "School Thik Karo" campaign
  4. 4The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (DSEL, Ministry of Education)statutory infrastructure and pupil-teacher ratio norms

More from this note