·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsEconomyEnvironmentIR

Discuss how carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAM) of developed economies pose challenges for India's export-oriented manufacturing sectors. Suggest measures to mitigate this impact.

In this answer
  1. Challenges for India's export-oriented manufacturing
  2. Measures to mitigate the impact

The EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, whose definitive phase began in January 2026, imposes a carbon-cost-linked levy on imports of steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers, hydrogen and electricity. For India's coal-intensive export manufacturing, it converts a climate instrument into a competitiveness barrier, demanding both negotiation and domestic decarbonisation.

Challenges for India's export-oriented manufacturing

  • Erosion of price competitiveness: ICRIER estimates India's steel exports to the EU could decline about 24%, with overall iron and steel exports falling 5.7% against just 1.2% for China — India's carbon-heavy production route is penalised disproportionately [1].
  • Incidence falls on Indian firms: the carbon cost is largely absorbed by exporters as price concessions to EU buyers, shrinking margins even where tonnage is retained [1].
  • Visible early impact: iron and steel exports to the EU fell 13% in the four months following CBAM's rollout [1].
  • Layering with trade defence measures: EU Regulation 2026/1384, effective 1 July 2026, caps duty-free steel imports at 18.3 million tonnes with a 50% out-of-quota duty; CBAM applies additionally, even within the quota [2].
  • Compliance burden: verified embedded-emissions reporting and accredited verifiers strain MSME exporters lacking measurement capacity.
  • Equity concern: a unilateral border levy sits uneasily with common but differentiated responsibilities and WTO non-discrimination principles.

Measures to mitigate the impact

  • Price carbon domestically: an operational carbon market lets India retain revenue that would otherwise accrue to Brussels, since carbon costs already paid are set off against CBAM; the India-EU FTA's technical cooperation on recognition of carbon prices provides the opening [3].
  • Use FTA safeguards: invoke the forward-looking MFN assurance on CBAM flexibilities and the €500 million transition support for emission reduction [3].
  • Decarbonise production: scrap-based electric arc furnaces, green hydrogen pilots and a green steel taxonomy to cut emission intensity — the only durable lever.
  • Diversify markets and pursue a negotiated multilateral framework on border carbon measures with other developing economies.

CBAM is less a passing trade irritant than a signal that carbon efficiency is becoming market access. India's advantage lies in treating compliance as an industrial-modernisation opportunity — aligning export competitiveness with its net-zero-2070 pledge and SDG-9 on sustainable industry.

Sources

  1. 1ICRIER, *Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM): Impact on India's Steel Exports to the EU and Carbon Tax Incidence*projected 24% fall in EU-bound steel exports, 5.7% global decline, 13% observed drop, tax incidence on Indian firms
  2. 2European Commission, Access2Markets — New EU safeguards on steel imports from third countries (Regulation (EU) 2026/1384)18.3 million tonne tariff-rate quota and 50% out-of-quota duty from 1 July 2026
  3. 3PIB, *India–EU Free Trade Agreement Concluded: A Strategic Breakthrough in India's Global Trade Engagement*forward-looking MFN assurance on CBAM flexibilities, recognition of carbon prices and verifiers, €500 million transition support
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Economy