·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Discuss how India's power infrastructure has emerged as a new threat to vulture conservation, and suggest a regulatory framework to mitigate it.

In this answer
  1. The chemical threat is receding, but recovery has stalled
  2. Why power lines are uniquely lethal
  3. A regulatory framework

India's vulture collapse — a 99.5% crash by 2007 — is treated as a solved, chemical problem [1]. Yet as diclofenac recedes, an infrastructural threat has replaced it: electrocution and collision on rapidly expanding transmission and distribution lines.

The chemical threat is receding, but recovery has stalled

  • Veterinary diclofenac was banned by the Drugs Controller General in August 2006 after BNHS surveys showed over 90% decline in white-backed, long-billed and slender-billed vultures [3]; vial size was later restricted to curb livestock misuse [4].
  • Bans were extended to aceclofenac and ketoprofen in 2023 [1].
  • Despite this, a 2025 survey found vultures nesting at only 50% of historic sites, indicating a second pressure at work [1].

Why power lines are uniquely lethal

  • Their large wingspan lets a single bird bridge two conductors, causing electrocution — a risk smaller birds escape [1].
  • Vultures favour open landscapes and elevated perches, precisely the geography of transmission corridors [1].
  • Carcass dumps near installations draw birds into danger zones; Sudhauwala (Dehradun) recorded 46 electrocuted vultures over 2011–14 [2].
  • Green-energy corridor expansion multiplies exposure, echoing the Great Indian Bustard powerline problem.
  • The stakes are quantified: a 2024 study linked vulture loss to a 4% rise in human mortality and $69.4 billion/year in damages through feral-dog-borne rabies [1].

A regulatory framework

  • Design standards: mandatory insulation, perch guards and bird diverters for new lines in notified vulture landscapes, embedded in transmission licensing and EIA clearance.
  • Sensitivity mapping around breeding centres at Pinjore and Rajabhatkhawa [5], with retrofitting timelines for DISCOMs.
  • Siting rules relocating carcass dumps away from high-tension lines — a proven, low-cost fix [2].
  • Institutional convergence: a MoEFCC–Ministry of Power joint protocol with mandatory avian-mortality reporting, backed by Schedule I protection [3].

Vulture conservation is no longer only a pharmacy question but an engineering and governance one. Building bird-safe infrastructure standards into India's energy transition would protect both a Critically Endangered genus and the public health it silently underwrites.

Sources

  1. 1Deadly span — India's power infrastructure is emerging as a big threat to vultures, The Hindu, 1 September 202699.5% decline; 2023 aceclofenac/ketoprofen ban; 2025 nesting-site survey; wingspan/perch vulnerability; 2024 mortality and $69.4 billion estimate
  2. 2Linear power infrastructure and vulture electrocution risk: mitigation through carcass dump relocation in Sudhauwala, Dehradun, Journal of Threatened Taxa46 electrocution deaths; carcass-dump relocation as mitigation
  3. 3Government has Taken Steps to Protect Vultures, PIBAugust 2006 veterinary diclofenac ban; BNHS 90% decline finding; Schedule I upgrade
  4. 4Environment Ministry Recommends Ban on Multidose Vial of Diclofenac to Save Vultures, PIBrestriction of diclofenac vial size against livestock misuse
  5. 5Environment Minister visits Vulture Conservation and Breeding Centre, Pinjore, PIBPinjore and Rajabhatkhawa breeding centres under MoEFCC/Central Zoo Authority

More from this note