·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Discuss the rationale behind reintroducing Merchant Discount Rate on UPI transactions. How does the tiered exemption structure balance fiscal sustainability with financial inclusion?

In this answer
  1. Rationale for reintroduction
  2. How the tiered structure balances the two goals

Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) is the fee a merchant pays banks and payment apps for processing a digital payment. NPCI's 0.4% MDR on person-to-merchant (P2M) UPI payments above ₹2,000, effective 15 October 2026, ends a blanket zero-MDR regime and seeks commercial sustainability without abandoning inclusion.

Rationale for reintroduction

  • Cost recovery for the ecosystem: UPI's servers, fraud controls, grievance handling and settlement costs were borne by banks and third-party apps under zero MDR, with no user-side revenue [1].
  • Fiscal sustainability: the substitute was budgetary — a ₹1,500 crore Cabinet-approved incentive scheme paying 0.15% on low-value BHIM-UPI (P2M) transactions [3]. A permanent public utility funded by an annually renewed grant is inherently fragile.
  • Regulatory principle: RBI's Discussion Paper on Charges in Payment Systems (2022) held that payment charges should be reasonable and competitively determined while giving intermediaries an optimal revenue stream [4].
  • Calibration: at 0.4%, UPI MDR stays well below credit card MDR (1.5–2.5%) and the debit card cap (0.90%) [2].

How the tiered structure balances the two goals

  • Inclusion preserved at the base: all P2P transfers remain free irrespective of amount; P2M payments up to ₹2,000 are free; small merchants under the P2PM category, including street vendors receiving up to ₹1 lakh monthly via QR, pay zero MDR on every transaction [1].
  • Revenue drawn from the top: only higher-value payments to larger merchants are charged, with a ₹300 cap above ₹75,000 preventing regressive burdens on big-ticket sales [2].
  • Net effect: roughly 96% of merchant transactions stay unaffected [1] — revenue is sourced where capacity to pay is greatest.

The design is defensible, but the burden concentrates on mid-sized, thin-margin retailers whose bills routinely cross ₹2,000, and a no-pass-through rule can curb only visible surcharges, not repricing or cash discounts [1]. Publishing the split of MDR between banks and apps, and tracking whether transactions cluster below ₹2,000, would uphold RBI's transparency standard [4] and keep UPI's digital public infrastructure both self-sustaining and universally accessible.

Sources

  1. 1UPI Continues to Remain Free for Peer to Peer Transactions and 96% of Merchant Transactions, PIB (2026)P2P and sub-₹2,000 exemption, P2PM small-merchant zero MDR, 96% of merchant transactions unaffected, no pass-through to consumers
  2. 2FAQs — Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) on Select UPI (P2M) Transactions, Department of Financial Services0.4% rate, ₹300 cap above ₹75,000, comparison with card MDR
  3. 3Cabinet approves Incentive scheme for promotion of low-value BHIM-UPI transactions (P2M), PIB₹1,500 crore outlay, 0.15% incentive on sub-₹2,000 small-merchant transactions
  4. 4Discussion Paper on Charges in Payment Systems, RBI (2022)nil UPI charges for users and merchants; charges should be reasonable, transparent and give intermediaries a viable revenue stream

More from this note