·PIB·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEconomySociety

Discuss how risk-pooling through government-financed insurance and investment in primary healthcare have changed India's health financing over the last decade. What challenges remain?

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Risk-pooling through government-financed insurance
  2. Investment in primary healthcare
  3. Challenges that remain

The National Health Accounts (NHA) 2023–24 show that households' out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) fell from 64.2% of total health expenditure (THE) in 2013-14 to 42.7% [1]. Two policy levers drove much of this fall: pooling through government-financed insurance and spending on primary care. However, families are still not fully protected from health costs.

Risk-pooling through government-financed insurance

  • The share of social security expenditure on health in THE rose from 6% to 11%. AB PM-JAY and State insurance schemes drove most of this rise [1].
  • Cashless hospitalisation moves inpatient costs, the most catastrophic risk for families, from household budgets to pooled public funds.
  • Government health expenditure (GHE) rose from ₹1,29,778 crore to ₹4,14,196 crore. Per capita GHE rose from ₹1,042 to ₹2,959 [1].

Investment in primary healthcare

  • Government spent about ₹1.53 lakh crore on primary care in 2023–24 [1]. This money flows through Ayushman Arogya Mandirs for NCD screening, free drugs and free diagnostics.
  • Janaushadhi, AMRIT pharmacies and NPPA price control target medicines, the largest item of OOPE [1].
  • Prevention lowers future spending on hospital care.

Challenges that remain

  • Post-COVID reversal: the OOPE share was 39.4% in 2021-22, when one-time pandemic spending was high [2]. It has since risen back to 42.7% [1].
  • Low fiscal effort: GHE was only 1.43% of GDP in 2022-23 [3]. The National Health Policy 2017 target was 2.5% by 2025 [5].
  • Leaks in "cashless" care: the CAG's PM-JAY audit found that 69% of patients in Meghalaya paid ₹12.34 crore at discharge. It also found ₹57.53 crore in excess payments in four States and 1,57,176 cases with non-unique beneficiary IDs [4].
  • Share is not protection: when THE grows fast, the OOPE share can fall even while the rupees families pay stay the same or rise.
  • Federal and spending gaps: health is in the State List, so results depend on State systems. Allocated health funds have also gone unspent [5].

Pooled public money has clearly taken over a large part of what households used to pay. The way forward is to raise GHE towards the NHP 2017 target, tighten PM-JAY empanelment and grievance redressal, and report SDG 3.8.2 alongside the NHA figures. These steps would turn a lower OOPE share into real financial protection, as Universal Health Coverage under SDG 3.8 requires.

Sources

  1. 1PIB, MoHFW: National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2023–24OOPE 64.2%→42.7%; GHE and per capita GHE; SSE share 6%→11%; ₹1.53 lakh crore on primary care; Janaushadhi/AMRIT/NPPA
  2. 2PIB, MoHFW: National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2020-21 and 2021-22OOPE share 39.4% in 2021-22
  3. 3PIB, MoHFW: National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2022-23GHE 1.43% of GDP in 2022-23
  4. 4CAG Report No. 11 of 2023: Performance Audit of AB PM-JAYpayments at discharge in Meghalaya, excess payments, non-unique IDs
  5. 5PRS Legislative Research: Demand for Grants Analysis, Health and Family WelfareNHP 2017 target of 2.5% of GDP by 2025; unspent health funds
Practice
8 questions on this item
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity