"The fall in the share of out-of-pocket expenditure in India's total health expenditure is necessary but not sufficient for financial protection." Critically examine this in light of the NHA 2023–24 estimates.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) is what households pay directly when they receive care. The NHA 2023–24 estimates show it fell from 64.2% to 42.7% of Total Health Expenditure (THE) between 2013-14 and 2023-24 [1]. The statement holds: the fall is real progress, but a smaller share does not on its own protect families from health costs.
Why the fall is necessary
- Public money replacing private payment: Government Health Expenditure (GHE) rose from ₹1,29,778 crore to ₹4,14,196 crore. Per capita GHE rose from ₹1,042 to ₹2,959 [1].
- Risk pooling: Social security expenditure on health, driven mainly by AB PM-JAY, rose from 6% to 11% of THE. This spreads costs across the insured instead of the sick [1].
- Targeting cost drivers: About ₹1.53 lakh crore went to primary care through Ayushman Arogya Mandirs. Janaushadhi and the free drugs initiative add to this. Both target medicines, the largest OOPE item [1].
Why it is not sufficient
- A share is not a burden: OOPE share = household payments ÷ THE. Fast public spending raises THE, so the share falls even if family bills stay the same.
- Hardship persists: Under the revised SDG 3.8.2 measure, WHO's 2025 India profile finds 30.9% of people (~44 crore) in financial hardship because of health spending [2].
- Post-COVID reversal: The OOPE share had dropped to 39.4% in 2021-22 because of one-time COVID spending [3]. So 42.7% is actually a rise. GHE was only 1.43% of GDP in 2022-23 [3]. The NHP 2017 target was 2.5% by 2025 [4].
- Leaky "cashless" cover: CAG Report No. 11 of 2023 found that 69% of PM-JAY patients in Meghalaya paid ₹12.34 crore at discharge. It also found ₹57.53 crore in excess payments to hospitals across four States [5].
- Federal unevenness: Health is in the State List. Differences in State spending and in hospital empanelment mean people with a card may still have no working hospital nearby.
Overall, the fall in OOPE shows that public financing has taken over much of what households used to pay. That is a necessary foundation. Turning it into real protection needs three things. First, the Union and the States should agree on a path to 2.5% of GDP. Second, NHA releases should report SDG 3.8.2 alongside the OOPE share. Third, PM-JAY leaks should be closed through physical checks of hospitals and grievance committees that actually meet. This would move India towards SDG 3.8 (Universal Health Coverage) and the right to health read into Article 21.
Sources
- 1PIB, MoHFW: National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2023–24OOPE 64.2%→42.7%; GHE ₹1,29,778 cr→₹4,14,196 cr; per capita GHE; SSE 6%→11%; ~₹1.53 lakh crore on primary care; related schemes
- 2WHO SEARO: India SDG Profile 202530.9% (~44 crore) in financial hardship under revised SDG 3.8.2
- 3PIB, MoHFW: Union Health Ministry Releases the National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2022-23OOPE share 39.4% in 2021-22 due to one-time COVID spending; GHE 1.43% of GDP in 2022-23
- 4PRS Legislative Research: Demand for Grants 2018-19 Analysis, Health and Family WelfareNHP 2017 target of 2.5% of GDP public health spending by 2025
- 5CAG: Report No. 11 of 2023, Performance Audit of AB PM-JAYMeghalaya patients paying ₹12.34 crore at discharge; ₹57.53 crore excess payments in four States