·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Discuss the role of trade-margin rationalisation in reducing out-of-pocket health expenditure in India.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Role of TMR in reducing OOPE
  2. Limitations
  3. Way forward

Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) fell from 62.6% to 47.1% of total health expenditure between 2014-15 and 2019-20 [1]. Medicines are a major part of what households still pay. Trade Margin Rationalisation (TMR) caps the gap between the price a company charges a stockist and the MRP a patient pays. This makes it a direct tool against OOPE, though an underused one.

Role of TMR in reducing OOPE

  • Targets the hidden mark-up: DPCO 2013 ceiling prices cover only scheduled (NLEM) drugs. For non-scheduled drugs, companies set their own MRPs and face only a 10% annual increase cap [4]. TMR addresses the margin that the ceiling-price system leaves open.
  • Proven impact: In 2019, NPPA used Para 19 of DPCO to cap trade margins at 30% on 42 anti-cancer drugs. MRPs of 526 brands fell by up to 90%, saving patients about ₹984 crore a year [2].
  • Prevention beats recovery: Between 2020 and 2025, NPPA recovered only ₹133.19 crore from 436 overcharging cases [3]. Capping margins in advance saves far more.
  • Keeps supply viable: TMR leaves the manufacturer's price untouched. Jan Aushadhi stores run on a fixed 20% margin [5], which shows that capped margins can sustain retail.
  • Fiscal gain: The Supreme Court noted that under Ayushman Bharat "the taxpayer pays" for inflated prices [6].

Limitations

  • Ad hoc: TMR rests on one-off use of an extraordinary power and is not a standing rule.
  • Narrow coverage: 42 molecules leave most of the non-scheduled market untouched.
  • Weak detection: NPPA relies on state Price Monitoring and Resource Units (PMRUs), drug controllers and complaints [3], and patients rarely know what a fair price is.
  • Supply risk: Retailers may stop stocking low-margin brands, so availability needs monitoring.
  • Partial remedy: OOPE also comes from diagnostics and hospital bills.

Way forward

  • Write slab-based TMR into DPCO so it applies automatically instead of case by case.
  • Strengthen PMRUs and publish price information that patients can check.
  • Expand Jan Aushadhi alongside TMR.

TMR works on the part of drug pricing that ceiling prices miss, which is the distribution margin. Making it a standing, broad-based rule with proper monitoring would turn a one-off success into lasting financial protection. That would advance Article 21's right to health and SDG 3.8 on Universal Health Coverage.

Sources

  1. 1National Health Accounts Estimates for India (2019-20) released — PIB: OOPE fell from 62.6% to 47.1% of total health expenditure
  2. 2NPPA caps Trade Margin of 42 non-scheduled anti-cancer medicines under TMR — PIB: 30% cap, 526 brands, up to 90% MRP cut, about ₹984 crore saved a year
  3. 3Quality and pricing of medicines — PIB: 436 overcharging cases, ₹133.19 crore recovered, reliance on PMRUs and complaints
  4. 4NPPA monitors the prices of scheduled as well as non-scheduled medicines under DPCO, 2013 — PIB: 10% annual MRP increase cap on non-scheduled drugs
  5. 5Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Janaushadhi Pariyojana (PMBJP) — PIB: 20% trade margin for Kendra operators
  6. 6SC flags steep mark-ups on essential drugs — The Hindu, 30 Sep 2026 (news): Bench's "taxpayer pays" observation on Ayushman Bharat

More from this note