Discuss the role of a whole-of-government approach and private capital, such as the RDI Scheme, in building India's innovation ecosystem for Viksit Bharat 2047.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
India spends only 0.84% of GDP on R&D (2023-24) [2]. ESTIC 2026 released an inter-ministerial National Vision Document covering 12 ministries/departments and 12 thematic areas [1]. Alongside the ₹1 lakh crore RDI Scheme [4], this points to a strategy with two engines: coordinated government action and patient private capital.
Role of the whole-of-government approach
- Ends siloed science policy: a single Vision Document sets shared long-term STI priorities aligned with Viksit Bharat 2047 [1].
- Accountability: a "theory of change" maps how each department contributes to the shared goal, with measurable three-year targets [1].
- Evidence base: the STI Outlook 2026, updated annually, measures the existing ecosystem to guide policy [1].
- Shared infrastructure: NM-ICPS (₹3,660 crore, approved 2018) [6] built 25 Technology Innovation Hubs in academic institutions [7].
- Integrated ecosystem: links academia, industry, startups and communities. For example, ocean-intelligence services put coastal communities at the centre [1].
Role of private capital: the RDI Scheme
- Takes on high risk: offers long-term financing or refinancing at low or nil interest for private-sector R&D [4].
- Builds on momentum: the private share of research spending (GERD) rose from 33.8% to 51.8% between 2019-20 and 2023-24 [2].
- Market-based selection: a Special Purpose Fund within ANRF lends through second-level fund managers [4]. TDB and BIRAC opened the first calls in Feb 2026 [5].
- From lab to market: moves the focus from discovery to deployment. The autonomous-systems roadmap runs from pilot validation (2030) to manufacturing (2035) to global competitiveness (2047) [1].
Challenges
- Low base: business R&D is still only about 0.4% of GDP (51.8% of 0.84%) [2].
- Slow execution: DST spent on average 4% below its Budget Estimates in 2016-20 [3]. By Feb 2026, only two fund managers had been appointed [5].
- Risk to basic science: three-year targets may favour projects close to a product over long-horizon research.
In short, the whole-of-government approach sets direction and private capital supplies scale. India should report target-versus-spending figures annually through the STI Outlook, publish how much RDI money is actually disbursed, set a separate goal for business R&D, and judge basic research by peer review. Together these can build the innovation-led, self-reliant economy envisioned for Viksit Bharat 2047 and SDG-9.
Sources
- 1ESTIC 2026 concludes: call for transformation through technology, PIBVision Document (12 ministries/departments, 12 themes), STI Outlook, theory of change, three-year targets, coastal communities, autonomous-systems roadmap
- 2Parliament Question: Research and Development Expenditure, PIB (based on DST R&D Statistics 2025-26)GERD 0.84% of GDP; private share 33.8% → 51.8%
- 3Demand for Grants 2021-22 Analysis: Science and Technology, PRS Legislative ResearchDST spent on average 4% below Budget Estimates in 2016-20
- 4Cabinet Approves Research Development and Innovation (RDI) Scheme, PIB₹1 lakh crore; low/nil-interest long-term financing; Special Purpose Fund in ANRF; second-level fund managers
- 5Parliament Question: Research, Development and Innovation (RDI) Scheme, PIBTDB and BIRAC as the first fund managers; calls opened Feb 2026
- 6Cabinet approves National Mission on Interdisciplinary Cyber-Physical Systems, PIB₹3,660 crore outlay, 2018
- 725 Technology Innovation Hubs through NM-ICPS, PIB25 TIHs