The downgrading of a State into a Union Territory raises fundamental questions about cooperative federalism. Examine with reference to Jammu & Kashmir.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →Article 1 describes India as a "Union of States". The J&K Reorganisation Act, 2019 turned a full State into two Union Territories: J&K, with a legislature, and Ladakh, without one [1]. This was the first time a State was downgraded. Cooperative federalism depends on consent and trust between the Union and the States, and this move put both under strain.
Questions it raises for cooperative federalism
- Consent bypassed: J&K was under President's Rule, so Parliament itself gave the "views" that the proviso to Article 3 requires from the State legislature [3]. The affected people had no say.
- An open constitutional question: The Supreme Court upheld the creation of Ladakh under Article 3(a) read with Explanation I. It did not decide whether a State can be converted into a UT, because the Solicitor General assured it that Statehood would be restored [3]. A future Parliament could use this as a precedent.
- Two power centres: A Lieutenant Governor administers the UT, and the Council of Ministers only "aids and advises" the LG [2]. The Assembly cannot make laws on Police or Public Order [2]. So voters hold the elected government responsible for things it does not control.
- Smaller executive: The Council of Ministers is capped at 10% of the Assembly [2], which means at most 9 ministers. Full States can have up to 15% under Article 164(1A).
- Trust deficit: Assembly elections were held as the Court required [3], but Statehood is still pending. The elected Assembly has formally asked for it back.
The Centre's case
- Security: J&K is a border region facing insurgency. Keeping police and public order under the Union [2] gives a single chain of command.
- Constitutional design: Article 3 lets Parliament reshape States. The Court rejected the argument that this reorganisation violated the federal structure [3].
Way forward
- The Union Home Ministry should publish a time-bound roadmap for Statehood.
- Parliament should amend the 2019 Act to hand police and public order back in stages.
- Parliament should adopt a rule that a State cannot be downgraded without the consent of its own legislature.
National security and federal trust can work together. If Statehood is restored soon, keeping the promise made to the Court [3], the Union's power under Article 3 would stay a tool for integration and not become a way to impose control. That would support the constitutional values of federalism and democracy, which the Court counts as part of the basic structure.
Sources
- 1PRS Legislative Research: The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Bill, 2019the 2019 reorganisation into the UT of J&K (with a legislature) and the UT of Ladakh
- 2PRS Bill Summary: The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Bill, 2019LG as administrator; Police and Public Order excluded; Council of Ministers capped at 10%
- 3Supreme Court of India: In Re Article 370 of the Constitution, 2023 INSC 1058 (11 Dec 2023)Article 3 proviso satisfied by Parliament; Ladakh upheld under Art. 3(a) with Explanation I; State-to-UT question left open on the Solicitor General's assurance; federalism challenge rejected; elections by 30 Sept 2024