Drones and counter-drone systems now dominate India's recent defence acquisitions. Discuss the doctrinal and industrial implications.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
On 26 October 2026, the Defence Acquisition Council approved proposals worth about Rs 2.12 lakh crore at the Acceptance of Necessity (AoN) stage. Kamikaze drones, counter-drone systems and very short-range air defence feature prominently, and about 82% is to come from Indian industry [1]. This changes how India plans to fight and tests what it can build at home.
Doctrinal Implications
- Linking sensors to weapons: the Integrated Surveillance & Strike System, Surveillance UAVs and UAS Brick Long Range [1] join the finding of a target to striking it. This moves warfare away from reliance on single large platforms.
- Cheap precision strike: Long Range Kamikaze Drones [1] allow strikes from a distance without risking pilots or using costly missiles.
- Protection from above: VSHORADS engage small aerial threats, and platform-based counter-drone systems improve tank survivability [1]. Armour must now be guarded against overhead attack.
- Layered naval defence: the Navy's Active Offboard Decoy System counters anti-ship missiles [1].
- Jointness: a Light Multi Role Helicopter shared by the Army and IAF [1] points to common platforms.
- Limits: only 15% of Army equipment is new-generation [2]. Drones add capability at the edges and must still work alongside older systems.
Industrial Implications
Opportunities
- Assured demand: 82% domestic sourcing [1] gives MSMEs and start-ups a steady flow of orders.
- Easier entry: modular, software-heavy drones suit smaller firms better than fighter or warship programmes do.
Concerns
- Import dependence: India was the second-largest arms importer in 2020–2024 [2].
- Capability gaps: PRS flags limited high-tech manufacturing, an R&D shortfall and quality concerns [2]. These are critical weaknesses for sensors, seekers and jamming electronics.
- Sourcing is not content: "82% from Indian industry" counts where orders go, not where parts are made. Imported chips can still hold up delivery.
- Slow procurement: CAG found that each case passes through 11 stages, with delays caused by multi-level approvals [3]. Drone technology may be outdated by the time it is delivered.
Drones and counter-drone systems are pushing Indian doctrine towards networked, layered and joint warfare, and they give domestic industry a rare large demand signal. To turn this into lasting capability, India should set a time limit for each stage after AoN, fund R&D in critical components, and update joint doctrine for unmanned warfare. That would make Aatmanirbhar Bharat in defence a measure of real capability, not just a sourcing figure.
Sources
- 1PIB: DAC clears capital acquisition proposals worth Rs 2.12 lakh crore for defence forces (26 Oct 2026)AoN value, 82% Indian industry, kamikaze drones, ISSS, VSHORADS, C-UAS, AODS, LMRH
- 2PRS Legislative Research: Demand for Grants 2026-27 Analysis – Defence15% new-generation Army equipment, second-largest arms importer, gaps in high-tech manufacturing, R&D and quality
- 3PRS Report Summary: CAG Report on Capital Acquisition in Indian Air Force (Report No. 3 of 2019)11 stages per case, delays from multi-level approval