·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEconomyEnvironment

"Energy security is economic security." In light of the recent West Asia crisis, examine how India's renewable energy transition has improved its resilience to external shocks.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Why energy security is economic security
  2. How the RE transition built resilience
  3. Limits to this resilience

At the Bharat Renewable Energy Summit & Expo 2026, the Prime Minister said a decade of clean-energy investment had cushioned India from the West Asia crisis [1]. India's non-fossil capacity now stands at 300.50 GW, over 54% of ~552 GW installed (July 2026) [2]. The transition has clearly raised resilience, but mainly in the power sector.

Why energy security is economic security

  • Imported fuels carry global shocks into the domestic economy. Price spikes widen the current account deficit, fuel inflation and weaken the rupee.
  • The Israel–US strikes on Iran showed how exposed India is to supply chokepoints like Hormuz [1].
  • A built solar or wind plant has no fuel import bill, so its tariffs stay stable.

How the RE transition built resilience

  • Scale: a record 55.29 GW of non-fossil capacity was added in FY 2025–26. Solar is the largest source at 164.59 GW [2].
  • Diversified mix: wind, hydro (57.24 GW), bio-power and nuclear spread the risk away from any single fuel [2].
  • Less fossil exposure: the 50% non-fossil NDC target was met in June 2025, five years early [2]. The share reached 53.2% by March 2026 [3].
  • Macro stability: growth continued through the crisis, and the PM pitched a ~US$220 bn RE investment opportunity by 2030 [1].

Limits to this resilience

  • Sectoral mismatch: the crisis hit oil and gas, but RE mostly replaces coal power. Oil is used mainly for transport and LPG, so RE protects against oil shocks only indirectly.
  • Unquantified claim: the PM gave no estimate of the damage avoided [1].
  • Capacity ≠ generation: the Standing Committee on Energy noted there is no framework to rate how well solar plants perform [4]. Weak transmission and storage also limit how much power is actually delivered.
  • Equipment dependence: key solar components are still largely imported. This adds a risk to new building rather than to plants already running.
  • About 200 GW is still needed to reach the 500 GW target [2].

So far, the transition has protected India's electricity supply better than its oil supply. Next steps:

  • build transmission through Green Energy Corridors and add battery storage;
  • extend PLI support to upstream components;
  • grow e-mobility and the National Green Hydrogen Mission so clean power actually cuts crude imports.

Done together, these would turn the Panchamrit pledge and SDG 7 into self-reliant, shock-proof growth.

Sources

  1. 1"Clean energy softened global crisis impact on India: Modi", The Hindu, 3 Nov 2026 (news report)PM's remarks at the Summit: crisis cushioning, West Asia trigger, continued growth, ~US$220 bn opportunity, no estimate of damage avoided
  2. 2PIB, "India Achieves Landmark 300 GW Non-Fossil Fuel Power Capacity" (9 Aug 2026)300.50 GW, 54% of ~552 GW, source-wise breakdown, 55.29 GW record, June 2025 NDC milestone, 500 GW target
  3. 3Ministry of Power, "Power Sector at a Glance – All India" (CEA data)53.2% non-fossil share as of 31 March 2026
  4. 4PRS Legislative Research, Report Summary: "Performance Evaluation of Solar Power Projects" (Standing Committee on Energy, Dec 2025)no framework to rate solar plant performance
Practice
8 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity