·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsEconomy

Examine how capital inflows through NRI deposit schemes can create liquidity management challenges for the central bank.

In this answer
  1. How the inflows become a liquidity problem
  2. Challenges for the central bank
  3. Way forward

Non-resident deposit schemes such as FCNR(B) are a proven tool for shoring up external buffers — the RBI's 2026 special USD-INR swap window mobilised about $136.4 billion across FCNR(B) deposits, ECBs and OFCBs by 31 August 2026 [1]. Yet every dollar absorbed releases rupees domestically, converting an external-sector success into an operational burden for the central bank.

How the inflows become a liquidity problem

  • Under the swap window, banks sell mobilised dollars to the RBI and receive rupees; reserve accretion shows up in the Weekly Statistical Supplement as record forex reserves [4], while an equivalent rupee injection swells systemic surplus.
  • Unlike fiscal or seasonal swings, this surplus is durable — it is created by multi-year deposits, not a one-week mismatch.

Challenges for the central bank

  • Weak transmission: excess liquidity pushes the overnight Weighted Average Call Rate (WACR) below the repo rate, blunting the policy signal; the RBI's Internal Working Group reaffirmed WACR as the operating target precisely to protect this link [3].
  • Inflation risk: unabsorbed liquidity fuels demand-pull pressures, complicating the 4%±2% inflation-targeting mandate.
  • Sterilisation burden: overnight VRRR auctions only park money for a day — a recent auction absorbed ₹71,971 crore of ₹75,000 crore notified at a 5.24% cut-off, with 96% bid coverage [2] — so the operation must be repeated indefinitely, and under-subscription shows the RBI cannot compel participation.
  • Quasi-fiscal cost and reversal risk: the RBI bears banks' hedging cost, and on maturity the flows reverse, flipping the task from absorption to injection.

Way forward

  • Match durable surplus with durable tools — OMO sales, longer-tenor VRRR and FX swaps, rather than overnight operations; the Internal Group on LAF had even suggested market stabilisation instruments for enduring surpluses [5].
  • Prefer non-debt-creating flows like FDI for structural financing.

Thus NRI deposits buy external resilience at the price of domestic liquidity complexity. A calibrated mix of tenor-matched absorption, advance signalling of auctions [3] and a shift toward stable, non-debt inflows would let India retain the buffer while restoring full monetary transmission.

Sources

  1. 1RBI Press Release — Data on Forex inflows via FCNR(B) Deposits, ECBs and OFCBs under the Reserve Bank's Swap facility (as on 31 August 2026)~$136.4 billion mobilised under the swap window
  2. 2RBI — Liquidity Adjustment Facility: auction resultsVRRR absorption of ₹71,971 crore, 5.24% cut-off, 96% bid coverage
  3. 3RBI, Report of the Internal Working Group to Review the Liquidity Management Framework (2025)WACR retained as operating target; shift to 7-day and shorter tenors with prior notice
  4. 4RBI, Weekly Statistical Supplement — Foreign Exchange Reservesreserve accretion from capital inflows
  5. 5RBI, Report of the Internal Group on Liquidity Adjustment Facilityinstruments for absorbing enduring surplus liquidity
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Economy