·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEconomy

Examine the challenges in Centre-State coordination in implementation of Centrally Sponsored Schemes, with reference to police modernisation.

In this answer
  1. Design asymmetry: Centre funds, States implement
  2. Procedural and fiscal friction
  3. Weak absorptive capacity
  4. Monitoring and last-mile compliance

Police and public order are State subjects (Entry 2, List II), yet capital-intensive modernisation runs largely on central money through the Modernisation of Police Forces (MPF) umbrella scheme. The Centre's admission before the Supreme Court that a fresh modernisation scheme still awaits Finance Ministry clearance [1] exposes the coordination deficit in Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS).

Design asymmetry: Centre funds, States implement

  • MPF was continued for 2021-22 to 2025-26 with a central outlay of ₹26,275 crore, of which ₹4,846 crore is for assistance to States/UTs [2].
  • Components are decided centrally — mobility, weaponry, communication, forensics [3] — while State priorities (housing, recruitment, local policing needs) may differ, producing one-size-fits-all conditionalities.

Procedural and fiscal friction

  • The new umbrella proposal moved to the Department of Expenditure on July 8, 2026 and remains pending in-principle approval [1]; multi-tier clearance stalls State budgeting cycles.
  • Matching-share obligations strain fiscally weak States, delaying release of the central tranche.

Weak absorptive capacity

  • Utilisation of modernisation funds swung between 14% and 86% across 2009-10 to 2015-16 [4] — money allotted is not money spent.
  • A shortfall of nearly 21% against sanctioned police strength [4] means equipment arrives without personnel to use it; the Standing Committee accordingly urged MHA to press States on recruitment drives [5].

Monitoring and last-mile compliance

  • The CCTV mandate in Paramvir Singh Saini (2020) [6] remains patchily implemented; non-functional cameras compelled judicial suo motu monitoring [1] — courts substituting for administrative supervision.

The problem is thus not scarcity of funds but the machinery linking sanction to outcome. A single-window inter-ministerial clearance, multi-year assured allocations, flexible State-specific components, outcome-linked release with a centralised monitoring dashboard, and human-resource augmentation alongside infrastructure can convert MPF from a transfer scheme into genuine cooperative federalism — securing both effective policing and the Article 21 guarantees it must protect.

Sources

  1. 1Police modernisation scheme awaits Finance Ministry's nod, The Hindu (Aug 6, 2026)proposal sent to Department of Expenditure on July 8, 2026; SC suo motu monitoring of CCTV compliance
  2. 2PIB: Government approves continuation of umbrella scheme of Modernisation of Police Forces (MPF)2021-22 to 2025-26 period, ₹26,275 crore total and ₹4,846 crore State/UT assistance outlay
  3. 3Ministry of Home Affairs: Modernisation of State Police Forces (MPF) Schemescheme components: mobility, weaponry, communication, forensics
  4. 4PRS Legislative Research, Police Reforms in India (2017)modernisation fund utilisation of 14%–86% (2009-10 to 2015-16); ~21% vacancy against sanctioned strength
  5. 5PRS Summary: Standing Committee on Home Affairs, Police – Training, Modernisation and Reforms (2022)recommendation on recruitment drives and removal of administrative bottlenecks
  6. 6Paramvir Singh Saini vs Baljit Singh, Supreme Court of India (Dec 2, 2020)mandatory CCTV installation in police stations and central agency offices
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity