‘Police modernisation scheme awaits Finance Ministry’s nod’

1. At a Glance

• The Union Government told the Supreme Court (Aug 5, 2026) that a proposal for a new umbrella scheme for police modernisation — covering both infrastructure and human resources — is with the Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance, pending in-principle approval [1].
• Arises out of the SC's ongoing monitoring of CCTV installation in police stations, flowing from the 2020 judgment in Paramvir Singh Saini vs Baljit Singh [1][2].
• Tests intersection of police reforms (State subject), Centre-State fiscal federalism, and judicial oversight of executive compliance.
• Links directly to the existing Modernisation of Police Forces (MPF) umbrella scheme run by MHA, useful for both Prelims facts and Mains governance analysis [3][4].

2. Why in the News

• On Wednesday, August 5, 2026, Additional Solicitor-General Rajkumar Bhaskar Thakare, appearing for the Centre, informed a Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta that a proposal for an umbrella police-modernisation scheme was forwarded to the Finance Ministry's Department of Expenditure on July 8, 2026, and remains under consideration [1].
• Submission made in a suo motu proceeding initiated by the SC in 2025, triggered by media reports of non-functional CCTV cameras at police stations in Udaipur, Rajasthan [1].
• Justice Mehta specifically asked whether the scheme would cover only infrastructure or also augmentation of human resources; the ASG confirmed it is meant to cover modernisation of the police force as a whole [1].

3. Background & Evolution

• 2006: SC's Prakash Singh vs Union of India laid down police reform directives (separate investigation/law-and-order wings, State Security Commissions, fixed tenure for DGPs) — the broader reform lineage this topic sits within [4].
• 2017 onward: MHA's sub-scheme renamed "Assistance to States for Modernization of Police" [3].
• December 2, 2020: SC delivers judgment in Paramvir Singh Saini vs Baljit Singh, mandating CCTV cameras with night-vision and audio-video recording capability at entry/exit points, lock-ups, corridors, and interrogation rooms of all police stations, and CCTVs also for premises of investigating agencies like the CBI, NIA, ED, NCB, DRI [2].
• 2021-22 to 2025-26: Cabinet approves continuation of the umbrella scheme "Modernisation of Police Forces (MPF)", with outlay of ₹4,846 crore for the sub-scheme "Assistance to States and Union Territories for Modernisation of Police (ASUMP)" [3].
• 2021 onward: UTs formally included within ASUMP from FY 2021-22 [3].
• 2023: SC records Sixth Report by Amicus Curiae on Centre/State compliance with CCTV directions [background context].
• 2025: SC initiates fresh suo motu proceeding after Udaipur CCTV non-functionality report; seeks compliance reports from Centre, States and UTs, and urges Centre to consider State requests for funds to install CCTVs and set up a centralised monitoring dashboard [1].
• July 8, 2026: Fresh proposal for an umbrella police-modernisation scheme sent to Department of Expenditure, Finance Ministry [1].

4. Core Static Facts

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Legal / Constitutional

• Flows from SC's continuing mandamus jurisdiction to enforce compliance with its own 2020 CCTV judgment [1][2].
• Highlights tension between "Police" and "Public Order" being State subjects (Entry 1 & 2, List II) and the Centre's role as funder/facilitator through Centrally Sponsored Schemes.
• CCTV mandate itself is tied to protection of fundamental rights under Article 21 (custodial torture/deaths prevention) [2].

Administrative

• Illustrates classic inter-ministerial delay: MHA's proposal stuck at Department of Expenditure for in-principle nod, showing friction in Centre's own budgetary approval process [1].
• Raises the federalism question of fund-sharing pattern between Centre and States for police modernisation — historically cost-shared (90:10 for NE/UTs, 60:40 for other States under CSS norms generally).
• Centralised monitoring dashboard proposal signals push toward tech-enabled oversight of last-mile compliance [1].

Governance / Ethical

• CCTV non-functionality (as in Udaipur) reflects a broader governance gap between scheme announcement and on-ground implementation/maintenance.
• Accountability mechanism: SC-mandated State-level oversight committees to review CCTV footage periodically [2].

Social

• Directly connects to custodial violence and deaths prevention — a long-standing human rights concern in Indian policing.

Scientific / Technological

• Scheme explicitly covers modern technology, weaponry, communication equipment for police stations, plus digital surveillance infrastructure [3].

6. Recent Developments (last 12-18 months)

• 2025: SC begins suo motu proceeding on non-functional CCTVs following Udaipur (Rajasthan) media report [1].
• 2025: Bench seeks compliance reports from Centre, States, UTs on CCTV installation status under Paramvir Singh Saini directions [1].
• 2025: Bench urges Centre to consider State requests for funds to install CCTVs and build a centralised monitoring dashboard [1].
• July 8, 2026: MHA sends proposal for umbrella police-modernisation scheme to Department of Expenditure, Finance Ministry [1].
• August 5, 2026: Centre informs SC the proposal is still under consideration at Finance Ministry; clarified scope includes human resource augmentation, not just infrastructure [1].

7. Prelims Hooks

• Paramvir Singh Saini vs Baljit Singh judgment delivered by the Supreme Court in 2020 on CCTV cameras in police stations [2].
• The current SC proceeding on CCTV compliance is a suo motu case, initiated in 2025 [1].
• Trigger for the 2025 suo motu case: non-functional CCTV cameras at police stations in Udaipur, Rajasthan [1].
• The pending police-modernisation proposal was sent to the Department of Expenditure, not directly to the Cabinet, for in-principle approval [1].
• Proposal forwarded to Finance Ministry on July 8, 2026 [1].
• Nodal ministry for police modernisation: Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), not the Law Ministry [3].
• Umbrella scheme name: "Modernisation of Police Forces (MPF)" [3].
• Sub-scheme for State/UT assistance: "Assistance to States and Union Territories for Modernisation of Police (ASUMP)" [3].
• Latest MPF continuation period: 2021-22 to 2025-26 [3].
• ASUMP outlay: ₹4,846 crore for the scheme period [3].
• UTs were brought under ASUMP from FY 2021-22 [3].
• "Police" and "Public Order" fall under the State List (Seventh Schedule) — hence Centre's role is only "assistance."
• The SC Bench hearing this matter comprises Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta [1].
• The Centre's counsel in this matter is Additional Solicitor-General Rajkumar Bhaskar Thakare [1].
• The proposed new umbrella scheme, per the Centre's submission, covers modernisation of the police force "as a whole" — infrastructure and human resources [1].

8. Mains Relevance

• GS-II: Polity & Governance — Centre-State relations, Statutory/regulatory/quasi-judicial bodies, judiciary's role in policy implementation, issues relating to development and management of Social Sector/Services.
• GS-II: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors; issues arising out of design and implementation.
• GS-III: Internal Security — police reforms, role of technology in law enforcement.
• Possible Mains questions: 1. "Judicial intervention has often driven police reform in India more than legislative or executive initiative. Discuss with reference to the Paramvir Singh Saini case and its aftermath." (GS-II) 2. "Examine the challenges in Centre-State coordination in implementation of Centrally Sponsored Schemes, with reference to police modernisation." (GS-II) 3. "Technology-driven policing (CCTV surveillance, centralised dashboards) can improve accountability but also raises concerns of privacy and effective utilisation. Comment." (GS-III/GS-II)

9. Related Topics to Study Next

• Prakash Singh vs Union of India (2006) — foundational police reforms judgment; useful comparative precedent for judicial activism in policing.
• Model Police Act, 2006 — legislative template for police reform States can adopt.
• National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) — data body relevant to policing statistics and custodial deaths.
• Custodial deaths and Article 21 — constitutional rights dimension linked to the CCTV mandate.
• Centrally Sponsored Schemes and cost-sharing patterns — fiscal federalism angle relevant to why Finance Ministry approval is needed.
• Smart Policing Initiative — related MHA sub-component under police modernisation [3].
• Second ARC Report on Public Order — administrative reform recommendations on policing.
• Police accountability commissions/State Security Commissions — oversight mechanisms parallel to CCTV oversight committees.

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

• Do not confuse MPF (Modernisation of Police Forces), the umbrella scheme, with ASUMP, its sub-scheme for States/UTs — they are often used interchangeably but are distinct in scheme architecture [3].
• Do not attribute the CCTV mandate to a 2025 judgment — the underlying directive is from Paramvir Singh Saini vs Baljit Singh (2020); 2025 is only when the fresh suo motu compliance case began [1][2].
• Avoid assuming the new "umbrella scheme" replaces MPF — as reported, it is a separate proposal still awaiting in-principle Finance Ministry approval, not yet a notified scheme [1].
• Police is a State subject; do not describe MHA's role as direct implementation — it is financial/technical assistance, with States/UTs as implementing agencies.
• Note that the article's trigger (Udaipur CCTV failure) is about implementation/maintenance failure, not absence of the scheme — the CCTV scheme already existed via the 2020 judgment; the gap is in the the modernisation umbrella scheme's approval and on-ground upkeep.