·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Examine the challenges in ground-truthing the Kasturirangan Report's recommendations.

In this answer
  1. Methodological and data gaps
  2. Administrative capacity
  3. Livelihood and political economy
  4. Federal friction

Ground-truthing means verifying, on the field, boundaries drawn from satellite imagery. The Kasturirangan High Level Working Group (2013) identified about 59,940 sq km of the Western Ghats as Ecologically Sensitive Area (ESA) using remote-sensing data [1]; over a decade later, the final notification remains pending because this verification is incomplete.

Methodological and data gaps

  • The mapping rests on 2012-vintage satellite data [1]; land use has since changed, so imagery and reality diverge.
  • The unit of mapping is the revenue village — an entire village enters the ESA if a fifth of it is "natural landscape" [1], sweeping in farmland and habitations and making field rebuttal inevitable.
  • Separating natural from cultural landscape (plantations, degraded forest) demands cadastral-level survey, not visual interpretation.

Administrative capacity

  • The draft ESA spans roughly 56,825 sq km across six States — Gujarat, Maharashtra, Goa, Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu — a survey load far beyond thin State forest and revenue staff.
  • MoEFCC has repeatedly held the extent "unchanged pending finalisation of proposals from the State Governments... by physical verification" [2], with successive draft notifications since 2014 restarting the objection cycle each time.

Livelihood and political economy

  • The regime bans mining, quarrying, thermal power, red-category industry and large construction [1]; affected interests amplify fears of displacement among cultivators.
  • Verification teams consequently face non-cooperation; Karnataka's Assembly has unanimously repudiated the report while seeking an alternative map.

Federal friction

  • ESAs are notified by the Centre under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 [4], but only State machinery can verify boundaries — a consent gap the Centre has tried to bridge through Chief Ministers' consultations [3].

Ground-truthing is therefore as much a trust-building exercise as a technical one. Refreshing the satellite base, demarcating below the village level so a farm and a fragile slope are treated differently, and settling Forest Rights Act claims through gram sabhas can convert verification into consensus. The cost of drift is real — the July 2024 Wayanad landslides killed hundreds in precisely such terrain [5] — making timely, participatory notification the surest route to SDG-15 goals.

Sources

  1. 1Report of the High Level Working Group on Western Ghats (Kasturirangan Committee), MoEFCC, 2013ESA extent, remote-sensing basis, revenue-village criterion, prohibited activities
  2. 2PIB, "Schemes to protect Western Ghats", Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate ChangeESA extent unchanged pending States' physical verification; repeated re-issue of draft notification
  3. 3PIB, "States express desire to expedite early notification of Ecologically Sensitive Area of Western Ghats"Centre–State consultation with the six Western Ghats States
  4. 4The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, India Code, MoEFCC_act,_1986.pdf) — statutory basis for the Centre's power to notify ESAs
  5. 5Situation Report: Wayanad Landslide (30 July 2024), ReliefWeb (UN OCHA)scale of casualties in fragile Western Ghats terrain

More from this note