·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolitySociety

Examine the effectiveness of the Nirbhaya Fund in addressing women's safety in Indian cities. What administrative gaps persist?

In this answer
  1. Effectiveness: institutional and infrastructural gains
  2. Administrative gaps that persist

Created in 2013 after the Delhi gang-rape case, the Nirbhaya Fund is a non-lapsable corpus administered by the Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, from which ministries propose projects for women's safety [1]. Its record in cities is one of visible institutional creation but uneven safety outcomes.

Effectiveness: institutional and infrastructural gains

  • Scale of financing: ₹7,712.85 crore allocated up to FY 2024-25, of which ₹5,846.08 crore (nearly 76%) has been utilised — a substantial delivery base [2].
  • Urban safety architecture: Safe City Projects in eight metros — Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Lucknow, Mumbai — use surveillance, lighting and technology-led policing [1].
  • Emergency response: the pan-India ERSS-112 integrates police, fire, ambulance and women-and-child helplines into a single number, cutting response delays [1].
  • Police accessibility: 14,658 Women Help Desks, most headed by women officers, and 827 Anti-Human Trafficking Units improve reporting comfort [2].
  • Justice delivery: 790 Fast Track Special Courts approved, disposing of over 3 lakh rape and POCSO cases [2].

Administrative gaps that persist

  • Outcome deficit: NCRB recorded 4,45,256 crimes against women in 2022, a 4% rise over 2021 — spending has not translated into declining incidence [3].
  • Split responsibility: DEA administers the corpus while MHA, MWCD and States implement, diffusing accountability and slowing appraisal [1].
  • Absorption shortfall: nearly a quarter of allocations remain unspent, reflecting weak State-level project formulation and utilisation capacity [2].
  • Hardware bias: emphasis on CCTV and control rooms over gender-sensitisation, women's police strength and last-mile transport safety.
  • Weak evaluation: no robust public outcome-audit linking expenditure to measurable reductions in urban crime or fear of crime.

The Fund has built durable institutions but has not yet made cities felt-safe. Convergence under Mission Shakti, outcome-based budgeting with third-party safety audits, and State capacity-building can shift it from expenditure to empowerment — realising Article 21's promise of liberty and SDG-5's goal of gender equality.

Sources

  1. 1Women Safety Initiatives Under Nirbhaya Fund — PIBnon-lapsable corpus under DEA; Safe City Projects in 8 cities; ERSS-112; split administration/implementation
  2. 2Government Implements Schemes under Nirbhaya Fund…utilizes nearly 76% of Nirbhaya Fund — PIB₹7,712.85 crore allocated, ₹5,846.08 crore (76%) utilised; Women Help Desks; AHTUs; Fast Track Special Courts
  3. 3Crime in India 2022, National Crime Records Bureau4,45,256 crimes against women in 2022, 4% rise over 2021
Practice
10 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity