·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsEconomy

Examine why India's first offshore wind seabed lease tender failed to attract adequate investor interest. What policy instruments can address this?

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Why investor interest was inadequate
  2. Policy instruments that can address it

India notified the Offshore Wind Energy Lease Rules in December 2023 and invited bids for 4 GW of offshore wind off the Tamil Nadu coast [1][2]. Despite nearly 35 GW of assessed potential off Tamil Nadu and 36 GW off Gujarat [1], the tender drew an inadequate response — a failure of project economics and ecosystem readiness, not of the wind resource.

Why investor interest was inadequate

  • No assured offtake: seabed lease rights were offered for captive, bilateral and open-access sale, leaving developers to find buyers without a firm long-term power purchase arrangement [2].
  • High upfront capital cost: offshore turbines, foundations and marine installation are far costlier than onshore wind or solar, and this tender carried no central financial support [1][2]. Officials have themselves acknowledged that expensive technology is the binding constraint [4].
  • Risk transfer to the bidder: winners had to undertake their own seabed, geo-technical and geo-physical surveys, adding unpriced pre-construction risk.
  • Missing supply chain and expertise: India has no domestic offshore wind manufacturing base, specialised vessels or port handling capacity, and few experienced developers [3][4].
  • Regulatory novelty: leasing in the Exclusive Economic Zone is a new domain requiring multiple maritime, defence and environmental clearances, lengthening timelines.

Policy instruments that can address it

  • Viability Gap Funding: the Cabinet-approved VGF scheme of ₹7,453 crore — including ₹6,853 crore for an initial 1 GW (500 MW each off Gujarat and Tamil Nadu) and ₹600 crore for upgrading two ports — directly lowers tariffs and makes power saleable to DISCOMs [3].
  • Government-funded de-risking: NIWE has completed feasibility studies off Tamil Nadu showing a capacity utilisation factor above 50%, well over onshore wind; sharing this data reduces bidder uncertainty [4].
  • Assured-offtake bidding under MNRE's central-assistance model, plus transmission and evacuation support [1].
  • Demand aggregation through green hydrogen hubs and concessional long-tenor finance to crowd in private capital.

Offshore wind's high, stable output makes it strategically valuable for India's 2030 non-fossil goals. Sequencing a smaller, VGF-backed, offtake-assured pilot before scaling — while building ports and local manufacturing — can convert Tamil Nadu's resource advantage into bankable projects.

Sources

  1. 1Offshore Wind — Ministry of New and Renewable EnergyOffshore Wind Energy Lease Rules notified 19 Dec 2023; ~35 GW potential off Tamil Nadu and 36 GW off Gujarat; development models with central financial assistance and transmission support
  2. 2Government invites bids for Development of 4 GW Off-shore Wind Energy Projects off the coast of Tamil Nadu, PIB4 GW seabed lease tender structure and captive/bilateral/open-access sale mode
  3. 3Cabinet approves Viability Gap Funding (VGF) scheme for implementation of Offshore Wind Energy Projects, PIB₹7,453 crore outlay, 1 GW initial capacity, ₹600 crore port upgradation, DISCOM viability rationale
  4. 4"Consultations on for offshore wind tenders in TN: official", The Hindu, 3 September 2026 — [thehindu.com](https://www.thehindu.com) — completed feasibility studies, CUF above 50%, earlier tender setback and high technology cost
Practice
10 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Economy