·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsEconomyEnvironment

Examine the role of mechanisms like Temporary General Network Access (T-GNA) in India's renewable energy evacuation framework. How do they affect the financial viability of RE projects?

In this answer
  1. Role in the evacuation framework
  2. Structural limitations
  3. Impact on financial viability

Temporary General Network Access (T-GNA), created under the CERC (Connectivity and General Network Access to the ISTS) Regulations, 2022, lets a generator use spare inter-State transmission capacity for durations ranging from a single time block up to 11 months [1]. It is an interim bridge between India's fast renewable capacity addition and its slower transmission buildout.

Role in the evacuation framework

  • Timing bridge: a solar park can be commissioned in about a year, while an ISTS line takes several years; T-GNA lets commissioned capacity sell power instead of lying idle [1].
  • Optimises spare corridors: it monetises underutilised ISTS headroom, important because wind and solar sites are geographically concentrated and inter-State lines to them remain limited [4].
  • Keeps the 500 GW pathway moving while firm corridors are built — the Centre has approved ISTS schemes worth ₹13,595 crore through Tariff Based Competitive Bidding to evacuate 9 GW from Rajasthan and Karnataka [3].

Structural limitations

  • Access is non-firm: T-GNA users are curtailed first when a corridor congests. ICRA finds about 37% of capacity at affected substations in the northern, western and southern regions runs on T-GNA and faces 30–50% curtailment during solar hours [2].
  • Curtailment risk is concentrated in RE-rich western and northern zones, and no transparent public data on curtailment volumes exists [4].

Impact on financial viability

  • Curtailment directly cuts saleable units, compressing revenue and debt-service coverage ratios on projects financed against full-generation assumptions.
  • Non-firm access carries no assured deemed-generation compensation, so lenders discount cash flows and price in higher risk premia, raising the cost of capital.
  • Persistent evacuation uncertainty has made developers visibly cautious in recent bidding rounds, slowing capacity contracting [2].

T-GNA is therefore an enabling stopgap, not a substitute for firm access. Synchronising renewable energy zone transmission commissioning with generation auctions, adding storage and system flexibility as NITI Aayog recommends [5], and publishing curtailment data [4] would convert it into a genuine transition tool and secure India's clean-energy targets.

Sources

  1. 1CERC (Connectivity and General Network Access to the Inter-State Transmission System) Regulations, 2022 — CERC Current Regulationsstatutory basis and duration of T-GNA (one time block to 11 months)
  2. 2Transmission constraints threaten India's renewable energy expansion — The HinduICRA data: 37% of capacity at affected substations on T-GNA, 30–50% solar-hour curtailment; cooling of bidding activity
  3. 3Government of India approves new transmission schemes worth ₹13,595 crore to evacuate 4.5 GW RE power each from Rajasthan and Karnataka — PIBISTS investment, 9 GW evacuation, TBCB mode
  4. 4Report of NITI Aayog on Renewables Integration in India — PRS Legislative Researchcurtailment definition, limited inter-State lines due to site concentration, absence of transparent curtailment data
  5. 5Report on India's Renewable Electricity Roadmap 2030 — NITI Aayogsystem flexibility and storage as the structural remedy
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Economy