·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsEconomyEnvironment

"India's renewable energy targets cannot be met without matching transmission and storage infrastructure." Critically analyze with reference to recent curtailment trends.

In this answer
  1. Evidence that transmission is now the bottleneck
  2. Why storage is the co-requisite
  3. Counter-view — the claim is partly overstated

India targets 500 GW non-fossil capacity by 2030, with renewables projected to supply over a third of generation by 2029-30. Yet the binding constraint has shifted from generation to evacuation: plants stand built while power cannot reach load centres. Recent curtailment trends validate the statement, though not wholly.

Evidence that transmission is now the bottleneck

  • Curtailment, the forced reduction of output due to grid congestion, is concentrated in solar hours in Rajasthan and Gujarat; rating agencies report that about a third of recently commissioned capacity depends on Temporary General Network Access (T-GNA) rather than firm access, facing 30–50% daytime backing-down [5].
  • Firm General Network Access and planned Renewable Energy Zones are the designed remedy, but capacity arrives in lumps while generation is bid annually [2].
  • NITI Aayog estimates roughly 335 GW of network is needed to connect 280 GW of variable renewables to the ISTS [4].

Why storage is the co-requisite

  • Wires alone cannot fix a midday surplus, evening peak mismatch; without battery storage and grid flexibility, surplus solar is curtailed even on an uncongested line [5].
  • The CEA's National Electricity Plan (Vol. II) therefore plans transmission alongside a ~900 GW installed base by 2031-32, factoring storage-backed dispatch [3].

Counter-view — the claim is partly overstated

  • Capacity build-out continues: ISTS schemes worth ₹13,595 crore were approved to evacuate 9 GW from Rajasthan and Karnataka [1].
  • Decentralised routes — rooftop solar under PM Surya Ghar and PM-KUSUM — partly bypass inter-State evacuation entirely.
  • The real gap is sequencing, not absence: TBCB transmission projects commissioned late relative to generation auctions [3].

The verdict, therefore, is calibrated agreement: targets are achievable, but only if transmission and storage are planned ahead of, not alongside, generation. Synchronising CEA planning with SECI auctions, accelerating Green Energy Corridors, and scaling battery storage would convert idle capacity into delivered green electrons — securing both the Panchamrit commitments and SDG-7.

Sources

  1. 1PIB — Government approves transmission schemes worth ₹13,595 crore to evacuate 4.5 GW RE each from Rajasthan and KarnatakaISTS investment and 9 GW evacuation
  2. 2PIB — Government Ensures Seamless Grid Integration for Renewable Energy Through Strong ISTS FrameworkGNA framework and Renewable Energy Zones
  3. 3CEA, National Electricity Plan (Volume II: Transmission)TBCB implementation, 2031-32 capacity planning
  4. 4NITI Aayog, Report on India's Renewable Electricity Roadmap 2030transmission network needed for variable RE integration
  5. 5ICRA assessment on transmission constraints and RE curtailment, reported in The Hindu (August 2026) — T-GNA dependence, daytime curtailment range, storage need *(link unverified; cited title-only)*
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Economy