·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsEconomyIR

Examine how social security agreements like the Double Contribution Convention address non-tariff barriers to trade in services.

In this answer
  1. How social security contributions act as a non-tariff barrier
  2. Mechanisms through which SSAs remove the barrier
  3. Assessment of impact and limits

Trade in services is obstructed less by tariffs than by regulatory frictions — visa caps, qualification recognition and, critically, mandatory host-country social security contributions that Indian professionals pay without ever drawing benefits. The India-UK Double Contribution Convention (DCC), in force alongside CETA from 15 July 2026 [1], illustrates how such agreements dismantle these behind-the-border barriers.

How social security contributions act as a non-tariff barrier

  • Short-term deputees under Mode 4 (movement of natural persons) contribute to the host system, yet minimum vesting periods mean the contribution is forfeited — a pure sunk cost.
  • This functions as a hidden cost escalator on service exports, raising the effective price of Indian IT and professional services and eroding competitiveness against local suppliers.
  • The burden falls hardest on MSME service exporters, for whom the outlay is not absorbable at scale.

Mechanisms through which SSAs remove the barrier

  • Detachment: a Certificate of Coverage exempts the deputee from host contributions while remaining covered at home [3]. The DCC extends this exemption from 3 to 5 years, matching real project cycles [1].
  • Totalisation of service periods across countries and exportability of pension protect long-term entitlement [3].
  • Equality of treatment removes discriminatory regulatory application.

Assessment of impact and limits

  • Over 75,000 Indian professionals and 900+ employers are covered, with industry estimates of savings exceeding USD 600 million annually [1][2].
  • Yet SSAs are partial remedies: they do not touch visa quotas, wage-parity conditions or professional-qualification recognition, which remain the binding constraints on Mode 4.
  • Coverage is also bilateral and uneven, leaving Indian workers in non-SSA destinations exposed.

Social security agreements thus convert an invisible fiscal levy into a neutral, reciprocal arrangement, making services liberalisation commercially meaningful rather than merely notional. Embedding DCC-type instruments in every future FTA — while simultaneously negotiating mutual recognition of qualifications — would let India translate its demographic and skills advantage into durable services export leadership, advancing the SDG-8 goal of decent work and productive employment.

Sources

  1. 1India and the United Kingdom Unleash a Next Generation Economic Corridor: CETA and Agreement on Social Security Contributions Set to Enter into Force on 15th July 2026, PIBDCC entry into force with CETA; exemption period raised from 3 to 5 years; 75,000+ professionals and 900+ companies benefited; ~USD 600 million annual savings
  2. 2India–UK CETA Comes into Effect, PIBimplementation of CETA and the parallel social security convention
  3. 3EPFO — International Workers / Social Security Agreementsdetachment and Certificate of Coverage, totalisation, exportability of pension, equality of treatment
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Economy