·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

"Falling per-GB data realisation alongside moderate ARPU growth raises questions about the financial sustainability of the telecom sector. Discuss." (10 m)

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Why sustainability concerns arise
  2. Why the picture is not wholly bleak
  3. The inclusion dilemma

TRAI's Yearly Performance Indicators for 2025-26 show wireless data usage up 24.74%. Data revenue rose only 11.53%, so revenue realised per GB fell 10.59% to ₹8.02 [1]. Monthly ARPU growth also slowed to 3.59%, from 16.89% a year earlier [1][2]. Together these point to real strain on the sector's finances, though not yet a crisis.

Why sustainability concerns arise

  • Volume without value: operators carry about 25% more data for about 12% more revenue. At the same time, 5G rollout and spectrum payments keep capital spending high [1].
  • Fading tariff effect: ARPU moved only from ₹174.46 to ₹180.73 [1]. The FY25 jump came from tariff increases, and that boost has largely played out [2].
  • Distorted base: FY26 figures now include Airtel's M2M SIMs, which it earlier left out [1]. These low-revenue machine connections drag down per-user metrics and make year-on-year comparison unreliable.
  • Weak third player: about 41% of DoT's budget goes to reviving BSNL and MTNL, and both still make losses. BSNL also gets ₹28,473 crore of fresh capital in 2026-27 [3]. Competition is being kept alive with taxpayer money, not user revenue.
  • Import-heavy capex: imports of telecom instruments rose 21% in 2024-25 [3], which raises network costs.

Why the picture is not wholly bleak

  • Revenue still growing: wireless data revenue reached ₹2,39,874 crore [1].
  • Deeper usage: average use is now 25.51 GB per subscriber per month (+18.49%) [1]. This gives operators a base for tiered and premium pricing.
  • Supportive law: the Telecommunications Act, 2023 keeps spectrum allocation mainly through auctions. It also renames USOF as Digital Bharat Nidhi and allows its use for R&D [4]. This eases the private burden in loss-making areas.

The inclusion dilemma

  • Rural subscribers grew only 3.20%, while urban rose 16.92% [1]. Steep tariff hikes to restore margins would hit the most price-sensitive users and widen the digital divide.

Low realisation, slower ARPU growth and state-supported competition together squeeze margins, even as usage booms. The way forward has four parts:

  • gradual, predictable tariff increases;
  • earning more from 5G through FWA and enterprise services;
  • TRAI reporting M2M SIMs separately;
  • targeted Digital Bharat Nidhi support so data stays affordable.

This would balance a viable industry with affordable, universal connectivity in line with SDG 9.

Sources

  1. 1PIB – "The Indian Telecom Services Yearly Performance Indicators" 2025-26 (TRAI)data volume/revenue growth, ₹8.02 per GB, ARPU ₹180.73 (+3.59%), M2M revision, usage per subscriber, rural/urban subscriber growth
  2. 2PIB – "The Indian Telecom Services Yearly Performance Indicators" 2024-25 (TRAI)ARPU ₹149.25 → ₹174.46 (+16.89%)
  3. 3PRS Legislative Research – Demand for Grants 2026-27 Analysis: Telecommunications41% of budget for BSNL/MTNL revival, ₹28,473 crore BSNL capital infusion, 21% rise in telecom imports
  4. 4PRS Legislative Research – The Telecommunications Bill, 2023spectrum by auction with administrative exceptions; USOF renamed Digital Bharat Nidhi, R&D use allowed

More from this note