Imbalanced fertiliser use has become a structural problem in Indian agriculture. Examine the role of soil-test-based and Integrated Nutrient Management approaches in addressing it.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
India applies nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (N, P, K) in a ratio of about 9.8 : 3.7 : 1. The recommended ratio is 4 : 2 : 1 [1]. The imbalance is structural because price policy drives it, not just a lack of awareness among farmers. Soil-test-based advice and Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) can correct it, but only if price and delivery reforms back them up.
Why the imbalance is structural
- Price signal: urea is fixed at ₹242 per 45 kg bag [2]. P&K prices under the Nutrient Based Subsidy move with world prices, so nitrogen stays the cheapest nutrient.
- Official recognition: the Standing Committee on Chemicals and Fertilisers asked for a roadmap to rationalise the relative pricing of urea and other fertilisers [3].
Role of soil-test-based approaches
- Soil Health Card: tests 12 parameters, including N, P, K, S, micronutrients, pH, EC and organic carbon. It has been an RKVY component since 2022-23 [4]. It replaces blanket doses with advice for each plot.
- 4R principle (right source, rate, time and place): Khet Bachaao Abhiyaan–Rabi 2026 promotes it in 100 high fertiliser-consuming districts [5].
- Limits: a CAG audit (Madhya Pradesh) found that only 48% of cardholders applied the recommended dose. It also found that grid sampling made the card data unreliable [6].
Role of INM
- Combines farmyard manure, compost, biofertilisers and crop residues with lower chemical doses [5].
- Green manuring with dhaincha fixes nitrogen biologically and cuts the need for urea in rice systems [5].
- Composting residue instead of burning it builds soil carbon and reduces air pollution in the Indo-Gangetic Plain [5].
- Limits: organic inputs are bulky and slower to show results, so farmers need incentives to adopt them.
Way forward
- Rationalise urea's relative price gradually [3].
- Link PM-PRANAM, which gives States 50% of the subsidy they save, to the high-consumption districts [7].
- Move to plot-level sampling and track fertiliser sales, not attendance at campaign events.
- Learn from Tamil Nadu and Kerala, which are already close to 4 : 2 : 1 [1].
Soil testing shows what a field needs, and INM supplies it sustainably, but both work against a distorted price signal. Combined with price rationalisation and incentives for States, they can restore nutrient balance and help meet SDG 2 and SDG 15.
Sources
- 1Balanced Use of Fertilizers: A Key Enabler of Sustainable Farming (PIB, Jan 2026): NPK ratio of 9.8 : 3.7 : 1 vs 4 : 2 : 1; Tamil Nadu and Kerala near the ideal ratio
- 2No Increase in Urea Prices; Reduction in Bag Size Aimed at Promoting Balanced Fertilizer Use (PIB): urea MRP of ₹242 per 45 kg bag
- 3PRS Legislative Research: Standing Committee on Chemicals and Fertilisers, Report Summary: roadmap to rationalise urea's relative pricing
- 4RKVY – Soil Health & Fertility (Soil Health Card), myScheme, Government of India: 12 parameters; merged into RKVY from 2022-23
- 5Khet Bachaao Abhiyaan – Rabi 2026 (PIB, MoA&FW): 4R principle, 100 target districts, INM, green manuring, residue composting
- 6CAG Performance Audit on Fertilizers, Government of Madhya Pradesh (Report No. 1 of 2025): 48% of cardholders applied the recommended dose; grid sampling made card data unreliable
- 7PM-PRANAM (india.gov.in): States receive 50% of the subsidy they save
Practice
6 questions on this item
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.