·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

India's aspiration to host the 2036 Olympics is undermined by its poor anti-doping record. Comment.

In this answer
  1. How the record weakens the bid
  2. Why the aspiration is not forfeited

WADA's 2024 Testing Figures show India returning 260 adverse findings from 7,113 samples — roughly a 3.6% positivity rate, the highest among major testing nations [1]. Since Olympic hosting rights turn on credibility as much as stadiums, this record is a genuine liability, though recent statutory reforms make it a recoverable one.

How the record weakens the bid

  • Credibility deficit: a persistently high positivity rate [1], sustained across years, makes India's clean-sport assurances hard to sell to the IOC.
  • Institutional distrust: WADA's Operation Carousel found NADA under-testing its Registered Testing Pool and poorly monitoring athlete whereabouts, surfacing 12 adverse findings and 97 whereabouts failures involving 70 athletes [2]. Host evaluation weighs regulator competence, not intent.
  • Reputational spillover: pre-Games positives spanning athletics, weightlifting, wrestling, wushu and judo before the 2026 Commonwealth and Asian Games force squad withdrawals and erode soft power precisely when India is auditioning as host; world athletics' integrity unit has placed India in its highest doping-risk bracket.
  • Perverse incentives: large cash rewards tied to medals nudge athletes and coaches toward shortcuts, converting isolated lapses into a tolerated culture.
  • Capacity mismatch: NADA remains thinly staffed, and testing volumes, though nearly doubled since 2019, trail leading sporting nations.

Why the aspiration is not forfeited

  • The National Anti-Doping Act, 2022 gave NADA statutory footing, implementing the UNESCO Convention and providing a legal framework for testing, enforcement and adjudication [3]; the Amendment Act, 2025 further aligned dispute resolution with the WADA Code [4].
  • The National Dope Testing Laboratory regained WADA accreditation in 2021 and was later approved to manage Athlete Biological Passports — restoring analytical capacity [5].
  • The National Sports Governance Act, 2025 creates a National Sports Board, a National Sports Tribunal, mandatory ethics codes, and links central funding to recognition — the accountability lever federations lacked [6].

India's doping record is today the weakest link in its 2036 pitch, but it is an institutional problem with institutional remedies. Fully staffing NADA, shifting rewards toward long-term athlete development over one-off medal bounties, and grassroots anti-doping education can convert a credibility risk into a demonstration of governance maturity — the surest foundation for hosting the Games.

Sources

  1. 1WADA, 2024 Anti-Doping Testing Figures ReportIndia's sample volume, adverse analytical findings and positivity rate
  2. 2WADA, Report of the Investigation into Allegations regarding NADA India ("Operation Carousel")inadequate testing of the Registered Testing Pool, whereabouts failures, resource shortfall
  3. 3The National Anti-Doping Act, 2022 (PRS Legislative Research)statutory NADA, UNESCO Convention, testing and adjudication framework
  4. 4PIB, Passage of the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025 and National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 20252025 amendment and faster dispute resolution
  5. 5PIB, National Dope Testing Laboratory regains WADA accreditationrestoration of laboratory accreditation and testing capacity
  6. 6The National Sports Governance Act, 2025 (PRS Legislative Research)National Sports Board, National Sports Tribunal, ethics codes, funding conditionality

More from this note