·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

"Middle powers neither command the international system nor submit passively to it." Discuss how coalitions of middle powers can keep multilateral cooperation going.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Agency between command and submission
  2. How middle-power coalitions sustain cooperation
  3. Limits

Middle powers are states with regional influence, economic weight and credible diplomatic networks. They lack the capacity to dictate global rules but are too consequential to be mere rule-takers. As great-power rivalry fragments the order, Canadian PM Mark Carney at Davos (January 2026) urged them to act together [1]. Coalitions are the means by which they become stabilisers of multilateralism.

Agency between command and submission

  • They draw leverage from strategic positioning, economic weight and diplomatic agility, not military dominance.
  • India's multi-alignment illustrates this: it works in the Quad as well as in BRICS and the SCO, without joining any bloc.

How middle-power coalitions sustain cooperation

  • Institutional workarounds: when the WTO Appellate Body was paralysed, the EU, Canada and Norway built on their arrangements to launch the MPIA (2020) [2]. It now covers 62 WTO members and about 60% of world trade [3].
  • Bridge-building and consensus: India's G20 presidency produced a consensus declaration despite the Ukraine divide, and admitted the African Union as a permanent member [4].
  • Agenda-setting for the Global South: the Voice of Global South Summit brought in 125 countries [5], and their priorities fed into the G20.
  • Norm entrepreneurship: groupings like MIKTA push for rule-based cooperation [6]. IBSA and the India–France-led International Solar Alliance advance issue-specific norms.

Limits

  • Divergent interests dilute collective positions, and informal clubs risk becoming talk-shops.
  • They have no enforcement power and still depend on great powers for security and markets, which leaves them open to tariff coercion.

Middle-power coalitions cannot replace great-power leadership. They can, however, keep the machinery of cooperation running through flexible, issue-based partnerships. India should combine its strategic autonomy with coalition leadership. It should push for reformed multilateralism (including UNSC reform), back stopgap arrangements, and champion the Global South. That would serve SDG 17 (partnerships) and the G20 vision of "One Earth, One Family, One Future".

Sources

  1. 1World Economic Forum — Davos 2026: Special address by Mark Carney, Prime Minister of CanadaCarney's January 2026 call for middle powers to act together
  2. 2European Commission — Interim appeal arrangement for WTO disputes becomes effective (30 April 2020)MPIA launched in 2020, building on EU–Canada–Norway arrangements
  3. 3European Commission — EU welcomes Cambodia to WTO appeal arrangement (September 2026)MPIA covers 62 WTO members and about 60% of world trade
  4. 4MEA — G20 New Delhi Leaders' Declaration (9–10 September 2023)consensus declaration; African Union admitted as permanent member
  5. 5MEA — 1st Voice of Global South SummitGlobal South summit with 125 participating countries
  6. 6UNDP Seoul Policy Centre — MIKTA: What's in a name? The potential of middle power cooperation to strengthen global governanceMIKTA as a middle-power grouping backing rule-based multilateralism

More from this note