·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsGeographyEconomyEnvironment

Natural gas is a bridge fuel, but it also risks carbon lock-in. Critically analyse in light of India's 15% gas-share target.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Gas as a bridge fuel
  2. Where lock-in risk arises
  3. Assessment

India aims to raise natural gas's share of its energy mix from about 6.3% to 15% by 2030 [1]. Gas is a bridge fuel: it cuts emissions while renewables scale up. The risk is carbon lock-in, where pipelines, terminals and decade-long contracts outlast that purpose.

Gas as a bridge fuel

  • Cleaner than coal and oil: NITI Aayog backs LNG for medium and heavy trucks, where electric trucks still cost far more [3].
  • Large gap to close: India's gas share is about 6%, against a global average of about 24% [2].
  • Firming renewables: gas plants can ramp up fast to back up solar and wind. But the Parliamentary committee found that high fuel costs have limited gas supply to the power sector [2].
  • Cleaner air: piped gas for cooking and CNG for transport reduce urban and indoor pollution.

Where lock-in risk arises

  • Long-lived assets: India has 8 regasification terminals (52.7 MMTPA) [5] and plans 70 mtpa by 2030 [3]. These assets are built to run for decades, beyond the bridge period.
  • Contract rigidity: long-term deals such as the 10-year ADNOC–Gujarat Energy SPA from 2028 [6] usually carry take-or-pay terms. Buyers must pay even if renewables and storage become cheaper.
  • Import dependence: gas imports rose from 13 MT to 27 MT between 2014-15 and 2024-25. LNG demand is projected to pass 40 MT by 2030, which exposes India to price volatility [2].
  • Price-sensitive demand: affordable pricing decides whether the target is met [4]. Costly gas risks stranded assets.
  • Methane leakage along the supply chain can erode gas's climate advantage.

Assessment

  • The lock-in risk is real but manageable. The answer is to target gas where it fits, not to reject it.
  • Gas should go to hard-to-electrify uses (fertiliser, heavy trucking, city gas, peaking power), not baseload power that renewables can supply.
  • Contracts should have price-review clauses, moderate tenures and suppliers from different countries.
  • Pipelines should be built so they can later carry biogas or hydrogen blends, which reduces stranding risk.

On balance, gas is a bridge only if it has a planned end point. A targeted, flexible push to 15% can lower emissions and protect energy security without locking India into fossil fuels. That keeps it consistent with Net Zero by 2070 and SDGs 7 and 13.

Sources

  1. 1PIB: Government has set a target to raise the share of natural gas in energy mix to 15% in 2030 from about 6.3%(exact release page not verified; domain root linked). Supports the 15% target and the 6.3% baseline.
  2. 2PRS India: Standing Committee Report Summary, Supply and Distribution of Natural Gas. Supports the global average, the import growth, demand projections, price volatility and the power-sector supply constraint.
  3. 3NITI Aayog: LNG as a Transportation Fuel in Medium & Heavy Commercial Vehicle Segment (2024). Supports LNG for trucking and the 70 mtpa regasification goal.
  4. 4PIB: Government intervention in keeping LNG prices affordable is key… MD & CEO, Petronet LNG(exact release page not verified; domain root linked). Supports affordability as the key to meeting the target.
  5. 5PIB (MoPNG): LNG regasification terminals and capacity(exact release page not verified; domain root linked). Supports the 8 terminals and 52.7 MMTPA.
  6. 6The Hindu: ADNOC inks 10-year LNG buy/sell pact with Gujarat Energy (7 Nov 2026)(article page not verified; domain root linked). Supports the 10-year SPA from 2028.
Practice
8 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Geography