'Oceans do not follow political boundaries.' Examine how science diplomacy can strengthen India's role as a net provider of public goods in the Indo-Pacific.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →Marine pollution, ocean warming and cyclones cross maritime borders, so no single country can handle them alone. At the Indo-Pacific Regional Dialogue (IPRD) 2026, India proposed "One Ocean, Shared Knowledge and Equitable Prosperity" as the principle for regional ocean cooperation [1]. Science diplomacy can turn this into public goods that the whole region can use.
How science diplomacy strengthens India's role
- Shared knowledge infrastructure: India offered joint scientific missions, reciprocal access to research facilities and data sharing [1]. These would give smaller coastal states research capacity they could not build alone.
- Climate services: India proposed regional climate-services partnerships for coasts and islands and better forecasting of extreme events [1]. This is a direct public good for vulnerable littoral states.
- Space-based observation: Indian satellites track ocean colour, sea-surface temperature and wind vectors [1]. This data can support fisheries advisories and disaster warnings across the region.
- Water security technology: India runs low-temperature desalination in Lakshadweep and a BARC-supported plant at Kalpakkam [1]. Both models can be shared with water-stressed island nations.
- Credible deep-ocean capability: Under Samudrayaan, India targets a crewed dive to 6,000 m in the NIOT-built Matsya submersible by 2028 [1]. This would make India a partner that can offer advanced capability, not just a recipient of it.
- Institutional anchor: The IPRD is built around the Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative (IPOI) [2], which gives these offers a ready multilateral framework.
Challenges
- Commons rhetoric vs. exclusive claims: India holds exclusive International Seabed Authority (ISA) rights to explore nodules in the Central Indian Ocean Basin, extended by five years in 2017 [3]. It also holds a separate polymetallic sulphide exploration contract [4]. Critics may question how "shared" India's approach really is.
- Mining vs. conservation: Deep-sea resource exploration can conflict with conservation and equitable use, which India itself has called for [1].
- Coordination: The mission-mode approach brings together ocean, space, nuclear and other sciences across several ministries [1], and that requires steady inter-ministerial coordination.
Way forward
- Make data sharing official through an IPOI-linked agreement with named partner countries.
- Publish environmental baseline data from India's ISA contract areas.
- Offer forecasting and desalination support through capacity-building packages.
Science diplomacy turns India's technical capability into regional trust. If India's offer is backed by open data and real partnerships, the "One Ocean" principle can become something other countries can check. That would support SDG 14 (Life Below Water) and the SAGAR vision of security and growth for all in the region.
Sources
- 1PIB: Dr. Jitendra Singh at Indo-Pacific Regional Dialogue 2026: "One Ocean" principle; joint missions, facility access and data sharing; climate services; satellite ocean observation; Lakshadweep and Kalpakkam desalination; Matsya 6,000 m by 2028; conservation and equitable use; mission-mode convergence
- 2PIB: 2022 Edition of the Indo-Pacific Regional Dialogue (IPRD-2022): IPRD centred on operationalising the IPOI
- 3PIB: India's Exclusive Rights to Explore Polymetallic Nodules from Central Indian Ocean Seabed Basin Extended by Five Years: exclusive ISA nodule rights extended in 2017
- 4PIB: India signs Contract for Exploration of Polymetallic Sulphides with International Seabed Authority: separate ISA sulphide exploration contract