·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEconomySociety

"Rehabilitation must restore an urban life, not merely allot a flat." Examine this in the context of slum resettlement policy in Indian metros.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Why the statement holds: shelter is tied to livelihood
  2. Evidence: flats without urban life stay empty
  3. Policy design gaps in metros
  4. Way forward

Delhi's Cluster Rehabilitation and Relocation Policy, 2026 moves the eligibility cut-off to 1 January 2025, covering about 4 lakh families [1]. Widening eligibility is only half the task. National data show that building a flat is not the same as rehousing a family. Rehabilitation works only when it keeps a household's livelihood, services and social networks intact.

Why the statement holds: shelter is tied to livelihood

  • Olga Tellis (Supreme Court) read the right to livelihood into Article 21. Moving people to the city's edge cuts them off from informal work.
  • Peripheral relocation also breaks access to schools, care networks and neighbours. Women and informal workers lose the most.
  • The Delhi High Court in Sudama Singh and Ajay Maken required surveys and meaningful engagement before demolition. Residents are rights-holders, not encroachers.

Evidence: flats without urban life stay empty

  • By December 2024 only 37% of sanctioned ISSR houses were complete, and only 30% of those were occupied [2].
  • The Standing Committee on Housing (2024) blamed incomplete infrastructure, houses not being allotted, and allottees unwilling to move in [2].
  • PMAY-U spent on average 34% less than its budget between 2017-18 and 2025-26 [2]. This lengthens the wait between demolition and a usable home.

Policy design gaps in metros

  • Cut-off dates and paperwork: every new date leaves out a new group, and paperwork tests penalise renters and migrants.
  • Finance: ISSR uses land as a resource through PPP [3], with central aid of only up to ₹1 lakh per house [4]. Kalkaji cost about ₹345 crore for 3,024 flats, roughly ₹11 lakh per flat [5]. Where land is cheap, developers stay away. Mumbai's builder-led model shows how this pushes states towards relocation.
  • Fragmented agencies: DDA (Centre) and DUSIB (Delhi) share responsibility, which blurs accountability.

Way forward

  • Make "in-situ first, relocation last" an enforceable rule, and keep any relocation within reach of residents' jobs.
  • No demolition until a serviced home is ready, with water, transport, schools and health care working from day one. MoHUA could link its final instalment to occupancy.
  • Build a single survey-based register open to public objections, and offer rental housing (ARHC) to later arrivals.
  • Name one accountable agency per cluster, with deadlines for each step.

Success should be measured by flats lived in and livelihoods kept, not units handed over. Kalkaji, Delhi's first in-situ project [5], shows that redevelopment on the same site is possible. Built around urban life, it can turn Article 21's promise of dignified shelter into reality and advance SDG 11.

Sources

  1. 1PIB — Union Home Minister chairs review meeting on rehabilitation of slums in New Delhi (2026)2026 policy, 01.01.2025 cut-off, ~4 lakh families
  2. 2PRS Legislative Research — Demand for Grants 2026-27 Analysis: Housing and Urban AffairsISSR completion/occupancy, Standing Committee findings, PMAY-U underspending
  3. 3MoHUA — "In-situ" Slum Redevelopment using Land as Resource (ISSR leaflet)land-as-resource PPP model
  4. 4PIB — Background material, Union Minister's press meet on Housing for AllISSR central assistance up to ₹1 lakh per house
  5. 5PIB — PM inaugurates 3,024 newly constructed flats at Kalkaji (2022)Kalkaji in-situ project, ~₹345 crore, 3,024 flats
Practice
6 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity