"The Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls shifts the burden of enrolment from the State to the elector." Critically examine this in light of the ECI's constitutional mandate.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →Article 324 gives the ECI "superintendence, direction and control" over electoral rolls. Article 326 guarantees adult suffrage to every citizen not disqualified by law [1]. The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) rebuilds rolls through fresh house-to-house enumeration. Its purpose is legitimate, but its design largely makes the voter responsible for staying enrolled.
How SIR shifts the burden to the elector
- Deletion for non-response: electors who did not return enumeration forms were left off the draft roll. To get back on, they must file Form 6, the new-elector form, along with a declaration [4].
- Bypasses the shifting procedure: Form 8 exists for voters who have changed residence [2]. ECI's own norms require a BLO field verification report for each shifting deletion [3]. SIR reverses this order: it deletes first and verifies later.
- Unequal impact: migrants, tenants and daily-wage workers have the least time and fewest documents to meet deadlines.
- Moves away from state-initiated registration. UN guidance finds this model more inclusive, but warns that people get dropped after an address change [7].
Why the ECI's approach has merit
- Constitutional mandate: Article 324 makes roll accuracy the ECI's duty. Dead, duplicate and shifted entries make impersonation possible.
- Judicial backing: in May 2026 the Supreme Court upheld the Bihar SIR order and the ECI's power to scrutinise citizenship. It also directed that Aadhaar be accepted as a 12th identity document [5].
- Built-in safeguards: no name can be deleted from the draft roll without a speaking order issued after notice [6]. A post-SIR special drive sends BLOs house-to-house to enrol electors who were left out [8].
Assessment The aim is constitutional, but the method is disproportionate. Cleaning the roll requires removing a name from the old address, not treating an existing voter as new. Failing to return a form is not a ground for disqualification under Article 326 [1].
SIR pursues roll purity at the cost of inclusion. The way forward is to:
- accept Form 8 or late enumeration forms from anyone on the previous roll;
- require BLO verification before every "shifted" deletion;
- publish lists of deletions with the reason for each.
Purity and inclusion are both part of the ECI's Article 324 mandate. A roll is truly clean only when no eligible citizen is missing from it, which is the promise of universal adult franchise.
Sources
- 1Constitution of India, Part XV (Elections), Articles 324–329, Ministry of External Affairs: ECI's superintendence over rolls (Art. 324); adult suffrage and grounds of disqualification (Art. 326)
- 2Forms for Registration in E-Roll (Form 6, Form 8), Election Commission of India: Form 6 for new electors; Form 8 for shifting of residence
- 3Note explaining process of annual revision/updation of electoral rolls (FAQ), Election Commission of India: shifting deletions need a form plus a BLO field verification report for each case
- 4FAQ on Special Intensive Revision (SIR) 2026, Chief Electoral Officer, Delhi: persons missing from the draft roll must file Form 6 with a Declaration Form
- 5Supreme Court of India, Judgment dated 27 May 2026 (2026 INSC 564): Bihar SIR upheld; ECI power to scrutinise citizenship; Aadhaar as 12th identity document
- 6PIB: Bihar SIR 2025 Daily Bulletin (1–18 Aug 2025): no deletion from the draft roll without notice and a speaking order by the ERO/AERO
- 7UN (OSAGI), Women and Elections, Ch. 4: Basic elements of voter registration: state-initiated registration is more inclusive; risk of removal after an address change
- 8ECI letter: Special drive in States after SIR (Oct 2026): BLO house-to-house drive to enrol left-out and first-time electors