·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Strengthening naval strike capability is central to India's maritime security in the Indo-Pacific. Critically analyse.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Why strike capability is central
  2. Limitations
  3. Way forward

Naval strike capability means the power to hit enemy ships and shore targets from long range. It is the basis of sea denial in a contested Indo-Pacific. In October 2026, the Ministry of Defence signed a Rs 661.50 crore contract for BrahMos fire control systems and launchers for Navy ships, with at least 68% indigenous content [1]. This shows strike power is a priority. However, it is necessary for maritime security but not sufficient on its own.

Why strike capability is central

  • Deterrence and sea denial: BrahMos is the Navy's primary surface-to-surface missile. It strikes sea and land targets at supersonic speed [1], which raises the cost of hostile action in the Indian Ocean Region.
  • Jointness: the missile can be fired from land, sea and air. It is in service with both the Navy and Army [3], so the services can operate together on one platform.
  • Strategic partnerships: India has exported BrahMos to the Philippines, and Vietnam, Indonesia and Malaysia have shown interest [2]. This makes India a security partner in Southeast Asia.
  • Aatmanirbharta: buying under the Buy (Indian-IDDM) category brings in MSMEs and creates jobs [1].

Limitations

  • Weapons outpace platforms: launchers are of no use without ships to carry them. Under Project-75, six submarines due by 2017 were completed only in 2025. About 65 ships and submarines are still under construction [4].
  • Funding gap: for 2021-26, capital outlay was Rs 9.01 lakh crore against a planned need of Rs 17.46 lakh crore, a 48% shortfall [4].
  • Slow procurement: the Standing Committee on Defence called MoD's 19–26 month acquisition cycle too long [4].
  • Strategic dependence: India took 10% of global arms imports in 2013–23 [4]. BrahMos is still co-owned with Russia's NPO Mashinostroyenia [3], so the supply risk remains.
  • Strike is one pillar: without surveillance and anti-submarine capability, missiles cannot find or protect against the threats that matter.

Way forward

  • Create the non-lapsable Defence Modernisation Fund recommended by the 15th Finance Commission [4].
  • Align weapon and hull delivery dates, and fast-track repeat orders for proven systems.
  • Use the Technology Development Fund to develop seekers and propulsion at home [4].

Strike capability is the cutting edge of India's maritime posture, but it adds to security only when platforms, funding and home-grown technology keep pace. A balanced build-up of strike power, ships, surveillance and partnerships, financed predictably, would let India serve as a reliable net security provider in a free and open Indo-Pacific.

Sources

  1. 1MoD signs Rs 661 crore contract to procure BrahMos Fire Control System and Launchers for Indian Navy ships, PIB, 6 Oct 2026contract value, 68% indigenous content, IDDM category, BrahMos as the Navy's primary SSM, MSME jobs
  2. 2From Strategic Partnership to Special and Privileged Bond: India-Russia Relations at a Glance, PIBBrahMos export to the Philippines; interest from Vietnam, Indonesia and Malaysia
  3. 3BrahMos, DRDO product pageDRDO–NPOM joint development; land, sea and air launch; in service with Navy and Army
  4. 4Demand for Grants 2025-26 Analysis: Defence, PRS Legislative ResearchProject-75 delay, 65 ships under construction, 48% capital shortfall, Standing Committee on acquisition timeline, import share, 15th FC fund, TDF

More from this note