UN peacekeeping missions in Africa are moving from expansion to exit. Using MINUSCA as an example, examine the challenges of transferring security responsibility to host states.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →MINUSCA was deployed in 2014 during the Central African Republic's (CAR) civil war. In November 2026 it was renewed unanimously, with a goal of "progressive transfer of authority" to CAR authorities, and its numbers were already falling [1]. Budgets and Council politics, more than readiness on the ground, are setting the pace of this exit.
Drivers of the exit
- Financial: The UN's liquidity crisis forced cuts to uniformed personnel and a smaller footprint limited to priority areas [4].
- Political: In 2025 the US abstained (14–0–1) after proposing a six-month extension [3]. The 2026 unanimity covered a mission that was already shrinking [1].
Challenges in transferring security responsibility
- Security vacuum: Armed groups remain active, and Rwandan and Burundian peacekeepers were killed in January 2021 [7]. If troops leave before national forces can cover territory, armed groups fill the gap.
- Weak state capacity: A handover needs an army, police, courts and local administration that work beyond the capital. There are no clear tests of whether these are ready.
- Calendar over conditions: The Council has mandated a multi-year strategic vision [2], but mandate and money still depend on a vote every year. CAR and troop contributors can plan only about 12 months ahead.
- Overstretched civilian protection: The protection mandate stays the same while fewer troops cover more ground [4].
- Legitimacy deficit: UN report A/71/99 found that MINUSCA's head did not follow up on sexual abuse allegations [5]. Only the troops' own countries can prosecute them. This erodes the local trust a handover needs.
- Risk of relapse: An early exit may lead to a costlier re-intervention later.
Way forward
- Conditions-based benchmarks for each phase, for example police posted in every district.
- Predictable financing, with assessed contributions paid on time.
- Police-centric capacity building: India's Formed Police Units and military observers, deployed since 2014, suit this role [6].
- Zero tolerance on abuse, with troop-contributing countries held accountable.
Leaving CAR is necessary, but MINUSCA shows that an exit needs a capable state to hand over to. A phased, benchmarked and adequately funded transition rather than withdrawal would protect the gains of more than a decade. It would also advance SDG 16 (peace, justice and strong institutions) and the UN Charter's promise of collective security.
Sources
- 1"UN extends mission to Central Africa by one year", The Hindu (AFP), 14 Nov 2026unanimous one-year renewal, progressive transfer to CAR authorities, drawdown under way, deployed 2014
- 2UN Press, SC/15493 (2023), Security Council renews MINUSCA mandatemandate to advance a multi-year strategic vision
- 3UN Press, SC/16219, 10041st Meeting – Resolution 2800 (2025)14–0–1 vote, US abstention, US proposal for a six-month extension
- 4UN Press, SC/16305, 10111th Meeting – Briefing on CAR (Feb 2026)uniformed personnel cut due to liquidity constraints, footprint reduced to priority areas
- 5UN Document A/71/99 (2016), Report of the independent review on sexual exploitation and abuse in CARMINUSCA head's failure to follow up on allegations
- 6MEA, India–Central African Republic Bilateral BriefIndia's Formed Police Units and military observers since 2014
- 7MEA, "India strongly condemns attack on MINUSCA peacekeepers in the Central African Republic" (19 Jan 2021)Rwandan and Burundian peacekeepers killed, January 2021