·PIB·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEconomy

A victim-centric criminal justice system needs more than speed. Evaluate measures such as Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centres and child-friendly courts.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Why speed alone falls short
  2. Merits of VWDCs and child-friendly courts
  3. Limitations
  4. Way forward

The Cabinet has extended the Fast Track Special Courts (FTSC) scheme for 2026–31. It will expand to 850 courts, and FTSCs have disposed of 4,02,457 cases so far [1]. The new cycle also funds Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centres (VWDCs) and child-friendly court spaces [1]. This shows that how a victim is heard matters as much as how fast.

Why speed alone falls short

  • Disposal is not the same as justice. The POCSO conviction rate was only 34.9% (2019) [6], so most completed trials still ended without a conviction.
  • Secondary victimisation: facing the accused, being questioned again and again, and hostile courtrooms push victims to turn hostile.

Merits of VWDCs and child-friendly courts

  • Shielded testimony: FTSCs set up VWDCs inside court premises so victims can depose safely and courts become child-friendly [2].
  • Better evidence, recorded early: they support POCSO Section 35, which requires the child's evidence within 30 days of cognizance [3]. This reduces trauma-driven retractions.
  • Continuity of prosecution: each 2026 court unit gets a dedicated Special Public Prosecutor [1].
  • Backed by evaluation: the NPC evaluation recommended adequate VWDCs and timely DNA reports [4].

Limitations

  • Uneven reach: States join voluntarily, and only 29 States/UTs take part [1], so protection depends on where the victim lives.
  • Buildings without trained people: the IIPA evaluation sought Special Judges with POCSO experience, sensitisation training and women prosecutors [5]. The 2026 scheme mandates none of these.
  • Forensic bottleneck: NPC found that late FSL/DNA reports kept FTSC cases pending for about a year [4]. A child-friendly room cannot make up for a delayed lab.
  • No outcome metrics: monitoring tracks disposals, not convictions or victim experience [1].
  • Fair-trial balance: shielding the victim must not weaken the accused's right to cross-examine.

Way forward

  • Make VWDCs mandatory in every district and fix time limits for forensic reports [4].
  • Appoint trained, gender-sensitive staff as IIPA advised [5]. Link victims to support persons and compensation.
  • Publish conviction and victim-feedback data for each court.

VWDCs and child-friendly courts are a real step from speed-centric to dignity-centric justice. But on their own they are only partly effective. Pairing them with trained personnel, forensic capacity and outcome-based monitoring would give real effect to Article 21's promise of a fair, humane trial and to SDG 16.

Sources

  1. 1Cabinet approves continuation of the CSS for Fast Track Special Courts, 2026–31 (PIB, 04 Nov 2026)850 courts, 4,02,457 disposals, VWDCs/child-friendly spaces, dedicated SPP, voluntary participation by 29 States/UTs, dashboard monitoring
  2. 2Swift Justice, Safer Society: The Impact of Fast Track Special Courts (PIB)VWDCs set up within FTSCs to make courts child-friendly
  3. 3Special Courts Under POCSO Act (PIB)Section 35: child's evidence within 30 days of cognizance
  4. 4NPC Third Party Evaluation of the Scheme on Fast Track Special Courts (Department of Justice)forensic/DNA report delays, adequate VWDCs, time limits for FSL reports
  5. 5IIPA Report on "Scheme of Fast Track Special Courts" (Department of Justice)POCSO-experienced Special Judges, sensitisation training, women public prosecutors
  6. 6POCSO cases registered, convicted and conviction rate 2017–2019, NCRB data (PIB)34.9% POCSO conviction rate in 2019
Practice
4 questions on this item
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity