A victim-centric criminal justice system needs more than speed. Evaluate measures such as Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centres and child-friendly courts.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
The Cabinet has extended the Fast Track Special Courts (FTSC) scheme for 2026–31. It will expand to 850 courts, and FTSCs have disposed of 4,02,457 cases so far [1]. The new cycle also funds Vulnerable Witness Deposition Centres (VWDCs) and child-friendly court spaces [1]. This shows that how a victim is heard matters as much as how fast.
Why speed alone falls short
- Disposal is not the same as justice. The POCSO conviction rate was only 34.9% (2019) [6], so most completed trials still ended without a conviction.
- Secondary victimisation: facing the accused, being questioned again and again, and hostile courtrooms push victims to turn hostile.
Merits of VWDCs and child-friendly courts
- Shielded testimony: FTSCs set up VWDCs inside court premises so victims can depose safely and courts become child-friendly [2].
- Better evidence, recorded early: they support POCSO Section 35, which requires the child's evidence within 30 days of cognizance [3]. This reduces trauma-driven retractions.
- Continuity of prosecution: each 2026 court unit gets a dedicated Special Public Prosecutor [1].
- Backed by evaluation: the NPC evaluation recommended adequate VWDCs and timely DNA reports [4].
Limitations
- Uneven reach: States join voluntarily, and only 29 States/UTs take part [1], so protection depends on where the victim lives.
- Buildings without trained people: the IIPA evaluation sought Special Judges with POCSO experience, sensitisation training and women prosecutors [5]. The 2026 scheme mandates none of these.
- Forensic bottleneck: NPC found that late FSL/DNA reports kept FTSC cases pending for about a year [4]. A child-friendly room cannot make up for a delayed lab.
- No outcome metrics: monitoring tracks disposals, not convictions or victim experience [1].
- Fair-trial balance: shielding the victim must not weaken the accused's right to cross-examine.
Way forward
- Make VWDCs mandatory in every district and fix time limits for forensic reports [4].
- Appoint trained, gender-sensitive staff as IIPA advised [5]. Link victims to support persons and compensation.
- Publish conviction and victim-feedback data for each court.
VWDCs and child-friendly courts are a real step from speed-centric to dignity-centric justice. But on their own they are only partly effective. Pairing them with trained personnel, forensic capacity and outcome-based monitoring would give real effect to Article 21's promise of a fair, humane trial and to SDG 16.
Sources
- 1Cabinet approves continuation of the CSS for Fast Track Special Courts, 2026–31 (PIB, 04 Nov 2026)850 courts, 4,02,457 disposals, VWDCs/child-friendly spaces, dedicated SPP, voluntary participation by 29 States/UTs, dashboard monitoring
- 2Swift Justice, Safer Society: The Impact of Fast Track Special Courts (PIB)VWDCs set up within FTSCs to make courts child-friendly
- 3Special Courts Under POCSO Act (PIB)Section 35: child's evidence within 30 days of cognizance
- 4NPC Third Party Evaluation of the Scheme on Fast Track Special Courts (Department of Justice)forensic/DNA report delays, adequate VWDCs, time limits for FSL reports
- 5IIPA Report on "Scheme of Fast Track Special Courts" (Department of Justice)POCSO-experienced Special Judges, sensitisation training, women public prosecutors
- 6POCSO cases registered, convicted and conviction rate 2017–2019, NCRB data (PIB)34.9% POCSO conviction rate in 2019
Practice
4 questions on this item
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.