Paying for and sustaining infrastructure: finance, monetisation, user charges and collective responsibility

Infrastructure: Transport, Communications and Energy · section 10 of 10

In this note
  1. Detail
  2. Prelims Hooks
  3. Mains Points

Detail

1. Why infrastructure finance is a special problem

  • Infrastructure (roads, railways, ports, power lines, pipelines, telecom) has three features:
  • High upfront cost. Most of the money is spent before any income comes in.
  • Long gestation. It takes years to build and decades to pay back.
  • Public-good character. Many people benefit, but it is hard to charge each one of them. So the market alone under-supplies it.

  • Historical link (Class 11): the colonial railways (the first line opened in 1853) were built mainly to serve British trade and administration, not Indian welfare. The question of who pays and who benefits is therefore old.

2. Greenfield vs brownfield projects

Greenfield project Brownfield project
What Built new on undeveloped land Upgrades, expands or takes over existing assets that are already operating
Risk Construction risk (delays, cost overruns) and demand risk (traffic may be lower than expected); needs patient capital (money that can wait many years for returns) Lower risk, because the revenue is already proven
Suits Government, DFIs, strategic developers Pension and insurance funds, InvITs
  • Why the difference matters: risk-averse long-term savers, such as pension funds, will fund brownfield assets. This frees government and developer money for new greenfield projects. This is the logic behind asset recycling (Section 4).

3. The bank problem: asset-liability mismatch

  • Asset-liability mismatch (ALM) means a bank's liabilities (deposits, mostly repayable in 1–3 years) are short-term, while its assets (infrastructure loans for 15–25 years) are long-term.
  • Banks borrow short and lend long.
  • If depositors withdraw, or interest rates rise, the bank is under stress.
  • Banks then cut infrastructure lending, and projects stall. Some of these loans turn into NPAs (non-performing assets, meaning loans that are not being repaid).

  • The RBI has noted that when infrastructure debt is mostly supplied by banks, the asset-liability mismatch becomes the central problem [8].

Fixes

  • Take-out financing (IIFCL scheme, 2010): a long-term lender takes over the loan from the bank after some years, usually once construction is done.
  • Worked example: Bank A lends ₹1,000 crore for a highway for 20 years. In year 4 the road is complete and tolls are flowing. IIFCL "takes out" ₹800 crore of the loan. Bank A now holds only ₹200 crore, and the freed ₹800 crore can go to a new project.

  • Infrastructure Debt Fund (IDF, 2011): an investment vehicle, sponsored by banks and NBFCs, into which domestic and offshore institutional investors, especially insurance and pension funds, invest through units and bonds [9].

  • IDFs mainly refinance (replace old loans with new, cheaper, longer loans) the existing debt of infrastructure companies. This creates fresh room for banks to lend to new projects [9].
  • An IDF-NBFC takes over loans of PPP projects that have completed one year of commercial operation [9].
  • A tripartite agreement (a three-party agreement) between the IDF, the concessionaire (the private operator) and the project authority ensures a compulsory buyout with termination payment if the project defaults [9]. This makes the loan nearly risk-free for the IDF.

  • Development finance institutions (DFIs): these are specialised lenders for long-term, high-risk projects.

  • IIFCL (India Infrastructure Finance Company Ltd), set up in 2006.
  • NaBFID (National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development), set up under the NaBFID Act, 2021:

    • It has two goals. The financial goal is to lend, invest in or attract investment into infrastructure. The developmental goal is to help build markets for infrastructure bonds, loans and derivatives [6].
    • Authorised capital of ₹1 lakh crore. The Centre owns 100% at first, and this can be reduced to a minimum of 26% [6].
    • It received a ₹5,000 crore grant by the end of its first financial year. The government may guarantee its bonds, at a concessional fee of up to 0.1% on borrowing from multilateral institutions [6].
    • It can raise money from the Centre, the RBI, scheduled commercial banks, mutual funds, multilateral institutions, and rupee or foreign-currency bonds [6].
    • It had sanctioned ~₹3.03 lakh crore and disbursed ~₹1.09 lakh crore as of December 2025 [7]. Its earlier sanctions stood at ₹86,804 crore (2024 review) [7].
  • Market instruments: InvITs, REITs, municipal bonds and green bonds (covered in financial-markets-instruments).

4. Asset recycling and monetisation

  • Asset recycling means the government raises money by monetising (earning cash from) operating public assets and uses it to build new ones.
  • Chain: an old highway is leased to an investor → the investor pays an upfront lump sum → the government builds a new highway with that money → the old highway returns to the government at the end of the lease.

  • Monetisation is not privatisation.

  • Only usage rights (the right to operate and collect revenue) are transferred, for a fixed period.
  • Ownership stays with the government, and the assets come back at the end.

  • Main models:

  • TOT (Toll-Operate-Transfer): an investor pays an upfront amount to collect tolls on a built highway for a fixed period, maintains it, and then hands it back.
  • InvIT (Infrastructure Investment Trust): a trust, similar to a mutual fund, that pools investors' money, buys operating assets, and pays out their income as regular returns.
  • OMT (Operate-Maintain-Transfer): a private party runs and maintains the asset for a fee or revenue share.

National Monetisation Pipeline (NMP, 2021)

  • Target of about ₹6 lakh crore over FY22–25.
  • It covered roads, railways, power transmission, gas pipelines, telecom towers, warehouses and stadiums.
  • Progress: ₹3.85 lakh crore was monetised in the first 3 years [4]. By the end, ministries had met nearly 90% of the ₹6 lakh crore target [2].
  • The NHAI (National Highways Authority of India) alone raised over ₹28,300 crore through InvIT and TOT in FY2025–26 [5].

Asset Monetisation Plan 2025-30 / NMP 2.0

  • The Union Budget 2025-26 announced the plan. It aims to plough back ₹10 lakh crore of capital into new projects over 2025-30 [3]. (NCERT scaffold: "about ₹10 lakh crore (verify current)". This is confirmed.)
  • NMP 2.0 was prepared by NITI Aayog. It estimates a total monetisation potential of ₹16.72 lakh crore, including ₹5.8 lakh crore of private investment, over FY2026–FY2030 [2].
  • Sectors: highways (including multimodal logistics parks and ropeways), railways, power, petroleum and natural gas, civil aviation, ports, warehousing, urban infrastructure, coal, mines, telecom and tourism [2].

5. User charges vs tax funding

  • User charges are payments by users, such as tolls, tariffs and fares, to recover the cost of a service. The alternative is funding from taxes, which everyone pays whether or not they use the service.
Case for user charges Case against user charges
Cost recovery: the asset pays for its own upkeep Equity: people's ability to pay differs, so the poor may be priced out
Efficient use: a price discourages waste, for example of water or power Some services create wide social benefits, so taxes are fairer
Leaves tax money free for health and education Class 10: private providers charge high rates, which is why the state often steps in
  • Worked example (toll cost recovery):
  • A bypass costs ₹500 crore, and upkeep costs ₹20 crore a year.
  • 20,000 cars use it each day at a ₹100 toll, which gives about ₹73 crore a year (20,000 × ₹100 × 365).
  • After upkeep, ₹53 crore a year is left, so the cost is recovered in about 9–10 years (ignoring interest).
  • If the toll is cut to ₹20, recovery takes decades. The gap must then come from taxes.

  • FASTag makes collection cheap. FASTag is an RFID sticker on the windscreen that deducts the toll electronically without stopping.

  • Toll collection on National Highways improved considerably after the FASTag programme began [11].
  • Daily FASTag collection crossed a record ₹193 crore in a single day (2023) [12].
  • A new user-fee rule pushes non-FASTag users towards digital payment [13]. Under this rule, a vehicle without a valid FASTag pays 2× the toll in cash but only 1.25× if paid by UPI (from November 2025) [13].

6. Value capture financing (VCF)

  • Value capture financing (VCF) funds infrastructure by capturing part of the rise in land and property values that the infrastructure itself creates.
  • Logic: a new metro station raises nearby land prices. The landowner gains without doing anything. The state takes back a share of that "unearned" gain to pay for the metro.

  • Tools:

  • Betterment levy: a one-time charge on properties that gain from a project.
  • Land value tax: an annual tax on the value of the land.
  • Premium FAR/TDR charges: fees for building extra floors. FAR (floor area ratio) is the total floor area allowed ÷ plot area. TDR (transferable development rights) are building rights that can be sold and used elsewhere.
  • Impact fees: charges on new developments for the extra load they put on infrastructure.

  • Worked example (betterment levy):

  • Land near a new metro rises from ₹50,000 to ₹80,000 per sq m.
  • That is a gain of ₹30,000 per sq m.
  • A 20% betterment levy captures ₹6,000 per sq m for the metro.

  • MoHUA VCF Policy Framework (2017): the Ministry of Urban Development framed VCF so that States and cities can raise money by tapping part of the rise in land and property values caused by public investment and policy decisions [10].

  • Metro Rail Policy (2017): States must adopt VCF tools such as the betterment levy to fund metros. The policy also makes Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) compulsory. TOD means compact, dense, mixed-use building along metro corridors [11].

7. Sustaining it: collective responsibility (Class 7)

The problems, despite the build-out

  • Roads are littered, buildings are stained and monuments are scribbled on.
  • There are potholes and broken streetlights (Fig. 7.27).
  • Waste management is poor (Fig. 7.26).
  • Such damage reduces ease of living and "becomes a burden for every citizen", because repairs are paid for with public money.

Local services must improve

  • Panchayats and municipalities must deliver waste management, sewers, traffic management, safe drinking water and pedestrian-friendly footpaths.

Sustainable infrastructure

  • Cleaner energy, such as solar panels on buildings.
  • Environment-friendly materials.
  • Less harm to biodiversity, such as alarm systems where animals cross railway tracks (Fig. 7.28).

Inclusive design

  • Infrastructure should work for children, the elderly and persons with disabilities (Fig. 7.29). Example: ramps, tactile paths and accessible toilets under the Accessible India Campaign (Sugamya Bharat Abhiyan, 2015).

Disaster-resilient infrastructure

  • The India-led Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI, 2019) promotes infrastructure that can survive floods, cyclones and earthquakes.

Trade-offs

  • Himalayan roads, coastal ports and island mega-projects bring development and environmental cost together.
  • Class 7's Q3 asks whether the two "can go hand in hand" (cross-ref environment-sustainable-development).

Shared roles

  • The state deters damage with penalties, as the Arthashastra did. It prescribed fines for damaging public works.
  • Citizens use infrastructure responsibly and report damage such as potholes and broken streetlights.
  • Class 7 activity: draw up a "Community Responsibility Pact".

The thread, closed

  • Satish's tomatoes reach the market only if every link holds: the road, the cold storage, the power supply and the phone network.
  • Quality infrastructure is the backbone of all economic activity, and keeping it working is everyone's duty.

Prelims Hooks

  • Asset monetisation ≠ privatisation. Under NMP, only usage rights are transferred. Ownership stays with the government, and the assets return at the end of the lease.
  • NMP 1.0 (2021): ₹6 lakh crore target over FY22–25, and nearly 90% was met [2]. NMP 2.0 was prepared by NITI Aayog: ₹16.72 lakh crore potential over FY2026–30 [2].
  • NaBFID Act, 2021: authorised capital ₹1 lakh crore. Government stake starts at 100% and can fall to a minimum of 26% [6].
  • IDF-NBFCs refinance PPP projects only after one year of commercial operation, backed by a tripartite agreement [9].
  • Take-out financing fixes banks' asset-liability mismatch. Trap: it does not mean the government writes off the loan.
  • Brownfield assets suit pension funds and InvITs. Greenfield projects need patient capital from government and DFIs.
  • Value capture financing tools include the betterment levy, land value tax, premium FAR/TDR and impact fees. The Metro Rail Policy 2017 requires VCF and TOD [11].
  • TOT, InvIT and OMT are monetisation models. BOT and EPC are construction models (trap).
  • CDRI was launched by India in 2019. The Accessible India Campaign began in 2015.

Mains Points

  • Asset recycling as a fiscal tool: brownfield assets are sold on lease to long-term investors, and the money funds greenfield projects without adding to the fiscal deficit (the gap between government spending and its non-borrowed income).
  • Risks: undervalued assets, monopoly pricing by operators, weak regulators and limited investor appetite. NMP 1.0 achieved about 90% of its target [2][4].

  • Fixing long-term finance: the bank-led model of the 2000s ended in twin-balance-sheet stress (bad loans at banks and heavy debt at companies) because of ALM [8].

  • The layered answer is: DFIs (IIFCL, NaBFID [6][7]) → take-out/IDF refinancing [9] → bond markets (InvITs, municipal and green bonds).

  • User charges vs equity (GS-III and GS-II):

  • Tolls and tariffs make users pay and encourage efficient use. FASTag has cut collection cost [12][13].
  • But access for the poor needs cross-subsidy, lifeline tariffs or tax funding. VCF shifts part of the burden onto landowners who gain without effort [10].

  • Sustaining assets is governance plus citizenship:

  • Capital spending must be matched by maintenance budgets, capable municipalities, inclusive and disaster-resilient design (CDRI) and civic responsibility.
  • Otherwise, poor upkeep and vandalism waste the assets that were built.

Sources

  1. 1Class 7, Ch 7 "Physical Infrastructure"; Class 11, Ch 1 "Indian Economy on the Eve of Independence" (primary)
  2. 2Union Finance Minister launches National Monetisation Pipeline 2.0 (NMP 2.0)pib.gov.in · tier 1
  3. 3Budget 2025-26: Multi-sectoral reforms in PPP, support to States, asset monetisationpib.gov.in · tier 1
  4. 4National Monetisation Pipeline monetised Rs 3.85 lakh crore of assets in 3 yearspib.gov.in · tier 1
  5. 5NHAI poised to achieve FY 2025–26 monetisation target, realises over Rs 28,300 crore through InvIT and TOTpib.gov.in · tier 1
  6. 6PRS Bill Summary: The National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development Bill, 2021prsindia.org · tier 1
  7. 7Infrastructure Financing in India: Trends, Institutions, and Innovations (PIB); FM reviews performance of NaBFIDpib.gov.in · tier 1
  8. 8RBI Bulletin December 2016, Speech (infrastructure financing and asset-liability mismatch)rbidocs.rbi.org.in · tier 1
  9. 9RBI FAQ: What is an Infrastructure Debt Fund (IDF)?rbi.org.in · tier 1
  10. 10Tapping value added to finance urban infra projects through innovative Value Capture Financingpib.gov.in · tier 1
  11. 11Union Cabinet approves new Metro Rail Policy (2017); Toll collection after introduction of FASTagspib.gov.in · tier 1
  12. 12Daily toll collection through FASTag reaches record high of over Rs 193 crorepib.gov.in · tier 1
  13. 13New user fee collection rule to incentivise digital payments at toll plazas for non-FASTag userspib.gov.in · tier 1