Irrigation, technology and the crop regime
Mughal Agrarian Society and Economy · section 3 of 10
In this note
Detail
Monsoon as the base of farming
- The monsoon was the backbone of Indian farming. Rain, not the state, decided the harvest.
- Rainfall drew the crop map:
- Areas with 40+ inches (about 100 cm) of rain a year grew rice.
- Middling-rain areas grew wheat.
-
Dry areas grew millets (jowar, bajra).
-
Crops that drink a lot of water could not depend on rain alone. They needed artificial irrigation.
Lifting water: the two machines in the Babur Nama
- Babur, in his memoir the Babur Nama, described two different water-lifting devices he saw in India.
- Persian wheel (also called sakia / saqiya) — used around Lahore and Dipalpur.
- A chain of small pots or buckets fixed to an endless rope or belt runs over a big wheel. As each pot reaches the top it tips its water into a trough. [2][3]
- The wheel is turned by a shaft linked to a horizontal wheel that bullocks, horses or donkeys walk around — animal power, not human. [2]
- Traditional wheels used earthenware pots on the rope chain; later versions used galvanised sheet steel. [3]
- Output of an animal-powered Persian wheel: about 8–10 cubic metres of water per hour at a 9 m lift, rising to 15–17 m³/hour at a 3 m lift. Efficiency about 50% at medium lifts. [3]
-
It stayed in wide use in north India and Pakistan into modern times. [2][3]
-
Bucket-lift / counterpoise lift (shadoof-type) — used in the Agra–Chandwar–Bayana belt.
- A bucket on a pole, balanced by a weight at the other end. A person swings it down, fills it, and the weight helps lift it. [3]
-
It only raises water 0.5–1 metre at a time, but works fast. On sloping land several can be placed one above the other to raise water higher in steps. [3]
-
Point to note: two regions, two machines. Technology was local, not uniform across the empire.
State canals
- The state dug new canals (nahr, nala) and repaired old ones.
- Best-known case: the shahnahr in Punjab, repaired under Shah Jahan.
- So irrigation had two layers — peasant-level lift devices (wheel, bucket) and state-level canal works.
Cattle-powered tools
- Light wooden plough with an iron tip.
- It was light enough for a pair of oxen to pull.
- It cut only a shallow furrow, which preserved moisture in the soil below — important in a hot country where deep turning would dry the land out.
-
It was cheap to make and easy to mend in the village.
-
Oxen-drawn seed drill — dropped seed into the furrow. But broadcasting (throwing seed by hand) stayed the main method of sowing.
- Narrow iron hoe — used for hoeing and weeding in the same operation.
- Big point: the kit was simple, animal-powered and cheap. Output grew by adding land and labour, not by heavy machines.
Two harvests a year
- The farming year had two seasons:
- Kharif — the autumn crop (sown with the monsoon).
-
Rabi — the spring crop (sown after the rains, harvested in spring).
-
At least two crops a year (do-fasla) were taken almost everywhere.
- Where water was assured, three crops a year were possible.
- Abul Fazl's Ain-i Akbari records the range:
- Agra — 39 varieties of crops
- Delhi — 43 varieties
-
Bengal — 50 varieties of rice alone
-
This is the proof of a rich and varied crop regime, not a bare subsistence one.
Jins-i kamil — the "perfect" crops
- Jins-i kamil means "perfect crops". These were cash crops the Mughal state actively pushed, because they brought in more revenue.
- The two best examples:
- Cotton — central India and the Deccan.
-
Sugarcane — Bengal par excellence.
-
Also in this class: oilseeds (like mustard) and lentils.
- Key idea for answers: subsistence and commerce sat in the same holding. The same peasant grew food to eat and a cash crop for the market. They were not two separate kinds of farmer.
New crops of the 17th century
- Maize (makka) — came to India via Africa and Spain. By the 17th century it was a major crop of western India.
- From the New World (the Americas) came tomato, potato and chilli — part of the wider Columbian Exchange, the two-way movement of crops after 1492 that also carried maize, potato and cassava to Europe. [4]
- Also new: pineapple and papaya.
- Tobacco — the sharpest case study:
- Reached the Deccan first, then spread north by the early 1600s.
- Absent from the Ain's lists of northern crops — strong evidence it arrived after Akbar's survey.
- Akbar's court saw it for the first time in 1604.
- Jahangir banned smoking — the ban failed. (Jahangir ruled 1605–1627.) [5]
- By 1700 tobacco was a major article of consumption, cultivation and trade.
- Tobacco is native to the Americas; Nicotiana rustica was the first tobacco carried to Europe in 1558, and it is still grown in India. [6]
The outcome — slow growth
- Population rose by about 50 million between 1600 and 1800 — a rise of roughly 33 per cent.
- This happened despite famines.
- Read it correctly: the growth was real but slow. The agrarian system could feed more people over two centuries, but it could not produce a sudden jump.
Prelims Hooks
- Persian wheel was noted by Babur at Lahore and Dipalpur; the bucket-lift at Agra–Chandwar–Bayana — both in the Babur Nama.
- Shahnahr canal in Punjab was repaired under Shah Jahan.
- Do-fasla = two crops a year (kharif autumn + rabi spring).
- Ain-i Akbari: Agra 39 crop varieties, Delhi 43, Bengal 50 rices alone.
- Jins-i kamil = "perfect crops" = cash crops; best examples cotton and sugarcane.
- 40 inches of rain marks the rice zone; below that, wheat, then millets.
- Tobacco: first seen at Akbar's court in 1604; absent from the Ain; Jahangir (r. 1605–1627) banned smoking and failed. [5]
- Maize entered India via Africa and Spain, big in western India by the 17th century.
- Population up about 50 million (≈33%) between 1600 and 1800.
- An animal-powered Persian wheel lifts about 8–10 m³ of water per hour at a 9 m lift. [3]
Mains Points
- Technology was simple but well matched to Indian conditions. The light iron-tipped plough gave shallow furrows that saved soil moisture; the seed drill and iron hoe raised labour output without costly machinery. So low technology did not mean low farming skill — but it also capped how fast output could rise.
- The state shaped the crop mix, not just the tax rate. By favouring jins-i kamil (cotton, sugarcane, oilseeds), the Mughal state pushed peasants towards the market. Revenue demand in cash made commercialisation a state policy effect, not only a merchant effect.
- Subsistence and commerce were not separate worlds. The same holding grew grain to eat and cotton or cane to sell. This blocks the old picture of a "self-sufficient, unchanging village" and links directly to Mughal monetisation, mandis and export trade.
- New World crops show the Indian economy was open to global flows. Maize, chilli, potato, tomato and tobacco entered through the Columbian Exchange [4]; tobacco's rise from unknown (absent from the Ain) to a major trade item by 1700, despite a royal ban, shows market demand beating state order.
Sources
- 1Class 12 Part 2, Ch 4 "Peasants, Zamindars and the State"; Class 8 Part 1, Ch 2 "Reshaping India's Political Map" (primary)
- 2Sakia | Ancient Egypt, Irrigation, Aqueductsbritannica.com · tier 3
- 3Review of Pumps and Water Lifting Devices, FAOfao.org · tier 2
- 4Which agricultural crops were introduced to Europe from the Americas during the Columbian Exchange?britannica.com · tier 3
- 5Jahangir | Mughal Emperorbritannica.com · tier 3
- 6Tobacco | Cultivation, Curing & Gradingbritannica.com · tier 3