IMPLEMENTATION OF AGRISTACK AND DIGITAL AGRICULTURE MISSION

Good, I have sufficient facts from Tier 1 sources. Writing the study note now.

1. At a Glance

2. Why in the News

3. Background & Evolution

4. Core Static Facts

Attribute Detail
Nodal Ministry Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare [S1]
Umbrella scheme Digital Agriculture Mission (Cabinet-approved, 2 Sep 2024) [S3]
Total outlay Rs. 2,817 crore (Central share: Rs. 1,940 crore) [S3]
Three registries Farmer Registry, Geo-Referenced Village Maps, Crop Sown Registry [S1][S4]
Registry ownership Created & maintained by State Governments/UTs (federated model) [S1][S4]
Unique identifier Farmer ID — digital identity linked to land records, crops, livestock/fisheries [S1][S2]
Target 11 crore Farmer IDs by 2026-27 [S2]
Progress (latest) 9.20 crore Farmer IDs generated as of 19.03.2026 (incl. 47.63 lakh in Bihar) [S4]; 7.63 crore by 27.11.2025, incl. 1.93 crore for women farmers [S2]
Data governance Federated structure; data ownership with States; access restricted to Government; no private company involved in building the federated database [S4]
Linked schemes PM-KISAN, PMFBY, MSP-based procurement, credit delivery, input distribution, disaster relief [S4]
Other DPI components under DAM Krishi Decision Support System, Comprehensive Soil Fertility & Profile Map [S2]

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Economic - Enables targeted DBT and reduces leakage in subsidy/credit delivery by linking verified land + crop data to beneficiary identity [S4]. - Facilitates faster, data-backed crop insurance (PMFBY) claims and MSP procurement verification [S4].

Social - Explicit tracking of women farmers' Farmer IDs (1.93 crore as of Nov 2025) signals gender-inclusion focus in DPI design [S2]. - Risk of exclusion errors for farmers without clear land titles or in tenancy arrangements (not directly sourced, but a standard DPI-adjacent concern flagged in governance analysis).

Legal/Governance - Data ownership vests with States, not the Centre or any private entity — a deliberate federated-DPI design choice to allay data-privacy/centralisation concerns [S4]. - Access to the federated database is restricted to Government entities only; explicitly no private company involvement in building it [S4].

Administrative - Federal implementation model: registries "created and maintained by State Governments/UTs," requiring Centre-State coordination — addressed via a dedicated National Workshop on AgriStack for scaling across schemes [S1][S5]. - Implementation pace varies by State (illustrated by State-wise Farmer ID figures, e.g., Bihar's 47.63 lakh) [S4].

Scientific/Technological - Positioned as farm-sector DPI analogous to India Stack (Aadhaar-UPI-DigiLocker model), using geo-referencing for village-level land mapping [S1]. - Feeds into allied tools like the Krishi Decision Support System for AI/data-driven agri-advisory [S2].

6. Recent Developments (last 12–18 months)

7. Prelims Hooks

8. Mains Relevance

9. Related Topics to Study Next

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

11. Sources