Carbon credit
Topic: Environment and Sustainable Development · NCERT: Beyond NCERT
Meaning
A carbon credit is a tradable certificate that stands for 1 tonne of CO₂e (carbon dioxide equivalent) that has been reduced, avoided or removed from the atmosphere. CO₂e means that other greenhouse gases are converted into the amount of CO₂ that would cause the same warming.
- Unit rule: 1 carbon credit = 1 t CO₂e cut, avoided or removed.
- Why it matters: a carbon credit gives a cut in emissions a price. A firm that cuts pollution can sell the cut, and a firm that pollutes has to pay for it.
- This is how a negative externality gets internalised. A negative externality is a harm, such as pollution, that the polluter does not pay for. Internalising it means making the polluter bear that cost in its own accounts.
Explanation
How a carbon credit works
- The basic problem: a factory's smoke harms other people and warms the planet, but nobody bills the factory for this.
- Its marginal social cost (MSC, the total cost to society of one more unit) is higher than its marginal private cost (MPC, the cost to the firm alone).
-
The gap between them is the marginal external cost (MEC, the harm done to others): MSC = MPC + MEC.
-
How a credit fixes it:
- Suppose one project cuts 1 t CO₂e more than it would otherwise have done. That cut is checked and turned into 1 credit.
- A buyer who needs to cover its own emissions pays for that credit.
-
The cheaper cut gets made, and the polluter pays a price for each tonne it emits.
-
Carbon market: a market where carbon credits or allowances are bought and sold.
- Carbon offset: buying credits to cancel out one's own emissions. For example, a company with a net-zero pledge buys credits equal to the emissions it cannot yet cut.
Two kinds of carbon market
| Compliance carbon market | Voluntary carbon market (VCM) | |
|---|---|---|
| Created by | Law | Buyers' own choice |
| Who buys | Covered firms that must hand in credits or allowances equal to their emissions | Firms with net-zero pledges, which offset by choice |
| Rules and standards | Set by the government or regulator | Verra, Gold Standard, and ICVCM's Core Carbon Principles (a quality benchmark) |
What makes a credit genuine: the four integrity tests
A credit is only worth something if the tonne it stands for is real. The four tests are:
- Additionality: the cut would not have happened without the money from the credit.
- Permanence: the carbon stays locked away. If a forest that was credited later burns, the carbon goes back into the air.
- No leakage: the emissions do not simply move to another place.
- No double counting: the same tonne is not claimed by two buyers or by two countries.
- What goes wrong when these fail:
- Some REDD+ credits faced integrity scandals. REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) is a forest-carbon programme.
- The amount of deforestation these projects claimed to have "avoided" was overstated.
- As a result, buyers paid for tonnes that were never really saved. This is greenwashing: claiming green credentials that are not real.
International lineage: Kyoto to Paris
- Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), under the Kyoto Protocol:
- Developed countries paid for emission-cutting projects in developing countries.
- In return they earned CERs (Certified Emission Reductions), which counted towards their own targets.
-
India was the second-largest host after China.
-
Paris Agreement, Article 6.2: ITMOs (Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes)
- These are country-to-country transfers of emission cuts.
-
They need "corresponding adjustments": the selling country adds the tonne back to its own account, so the cut is not counted twice.
-
Paris Agreement, Article 6.4: PACM (Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism)
- This is a UN-supervised crediting system. It replaced the CDM.
- Its rules were finalised at COP29 (Baku, 2024).
- Standards were adopted on the baseline (what emissions would have been without the project), on leakage, and on reversal (making sure stored carbon is not lost later) [4].
- The UNFCCC says Article 6 could help save up to US$250 billion a year in the cost of carrying out national climate plans [4].
In India
- Step 1: PAT scheme (Perform, Achieve and Trade), 2012
- Energy-intensive plants got energy-saving targets.
-
Plants that beat their target earned ESCerts (Energy Saving Certificates) to sell. Plants that missed their target had to buy them.
-
Step 2: Energy Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2022
-
This gave the government legal power to specify a carbon credit trading scheme.
-
Step 3: Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS), notified June 2023
- It created the Indian Carbon Market (ICM) and a National Steering Committee for the Indian Carbon Market (NSCICM) [2].
- Aim: to reduce or avoid GHG emissions by pricing them through tradable Carbon Credit Certificates (CCCs) [2].
-
Who runs it:
- BEE (Bureau of Energy Efficiency) is the administrator.
- Grid-India is the registry, which keeps the record of who holds which credits.
- CERC (Central Electricity Regulatory Commission) regulates trading.
-
(a) Compliance mechanism
- Obligated Entities must meet GHG Emission Intensity (GEI) targets. These are measured in tonnes of CO₂e per tonne of product, not as an absolute cap on total emissions [2][3].
- Entities that do better than their target earn CCCs and can sell them. Entities that miss their target must buy CCCs [2].
- The first GEI targets covered 7 sectors moved over from PAT: aluminium, cement, chlor-alkali, petrochemicals, petroleum refineries, pulp and paper, and textiles [2].
-
GEI targets were later notified for 208 more carbon-intensive industrial units [1].
-
(b) Offset mechanism
-
Entities that are not obligated can voluntarily register projects and earn credits.
-
Worked example: how a cement plant earns CCCs
- The plant's target is 0.60 t CO₂e per tonne of cement. It produces 10 lakh t of cement.
- Allowed emissions = 0.60 × 10 lakh = 6 lakh t CO₂e.
- Its actual intensity is 0.57, so it emits 0.57 × 10 lakh = 5.7 lakh t.
- The difference is 6 lakh − 5.7 lakh = 30,000 t, so it earns 30,000 CCCs that it can sell.
-
Catch: if output grows, total emissions can still rise. This fits India's NDC (national climate target), which is framed as emissions intensity of GDP (emissions per rupee of GDP).
-
Link to CBAM: the EU's CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism) is a charge on the carbon released while making imported goods. Its payment phase starts in 2026. A working domestic carbon price under the CCTS can help Indian exporters argue for a deduction, because carbon already paid for at home can reduce the charge.
Don't confuse with
- Carbon allowance (permit): an allowance is the right to emit 1 t CO₂e under a government cap, as in the EU ETS. A carbon credit is proof that 1 t CO₂e was reduced, avoided or removed.
- Carbon tax: a carbon tax fixes the price of carbon, so the amount by which emissions fall stays uncertain. Credit and permit markets let the market set the price.
- Green Credit (Green Credit Programme): it rewards actions such as tree planting or water conservation. It is not a certified tonne of CO₂e, so it is not a carbon credit.
- ESCerts (PAT) and RECs:
- An ESCert counts energy saved.
- A REC (Renewable Energy Certificate) is proof that renewable power was generated. Discoms (power distribution companies) buy RECs to meet their renewable purchase obligations.
- Neither of them counts a tonne of CO₂e directly.
Prelims Hooks
- 1 carbon credit = 1 t CO₂e reduced, avoided or removed. In India's CCTS, 1 CCC = 1 t CO₂e.
- CCTS (June 2023) was notified under the Energy Conservation (Amendment) Act 2022. BEE is the administrator, Grid-India the registry and CERC the trading regulator [2].
- CCTS targets are emission intensity (GEI) targets, not absolute caps. The first 7 sectors came over from PAT, and targets were later notified for 208 more units [1][2].
- The four integrity tests: additionality, permanence, no leakage and no double counting.
- Article 6.2 = ITMOs (country-to-country transfers, with corresponding adjustments). Article 6.4 = PACM, the successor to the CDM, with rules finalised at COP29 (Baku, 2024) [4].
- Trap: a Green Credit is not a carbon credit. Under the Kyoto Protocol's CDM, India was the second-largest host after China.
Mains Points
- Intensity-based credits protect growth but do not guarantee lower total emissions.
- Efficient plants are rewarded with CCCs, while output is still allowed to grow.
-
Total emissions can still rise, so the CCTS fits India's intensity-based NDC but does not ensure that absolute emissions fall.
-
Integrity decides whether credits help the climate or only look green.
- The REDD+ scandals show the risk of greenwashing.
- Corresponding adjustments under Article 6 and the COP29 standards on baseline, leakage and reversal strengthen trust [4].
-
India needs strong MRV (Monitoring, Reporting and Verification) for its offset mechanism.
-
Carbon credits and trade (GS-II/III):
- CBAM tackles carbon leakage, but it shifts the burden onto developing-country exporters, especially of steel and aluminium. India calls it unilateral and against CBDR (Common But Differentiated Responsibilities).
- A credible CCTS price can help India seek a CBAM deduction.
- India can also earn climate finance by selling cuts through Article 6.
Related concepts
- Internalisation of externalities
- Carbon pricing
- Green tax
- Social cost of carbon
- Internal carbon price
- Fossil fuel subsidies
- Cap-and-trade
- Carbon market
- Compliance carbon market
- Voluntary carbon market
Read more
Sources
- 1Government notifies Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity Targets for 208 more Carbon-intensive Industriespib.gov.in · tier 1
- 2Carbon Pricing in India (PIB Press Note)pib.gov.in · tier 1
- 3Framework for Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS)pib.gov.in · tier 1
- 4COP29 Agrees International Carbon Market Standardsunfccc.int · tier 2