Resource curse

Indian Economy glossary

Also called: Paradox of plenty · Topic: Economic Growth Theories and Business Cycles · NCERT: Beyond NCERT

Meaning

The resource curse (also called the paradox of plenty) is the pattern in which countries rich in natural resources such as oil, minerals or gems often grow more slowly than countries with few resources, and also tend to have weaker institutions and more conflict. It matters because it shows that natural wealth does not automatically make a country rich. How the wealth is governed decides whether it helps or harms growth.

Explanation

Origin of the idea

  • The idea is linked to Auty (1993) and Sachs-Warner (1995).
  • It is one of two growth traps in growth theory. A growth trap is a situation where a country's growth slows down, stays slow, and does not catch up with rich countries.
  • The middle-income trap comes from the country's stage of development.
  • The resource curse comes from having a lot of natural resources.

The four channels: how the curse works

  • 1. Dutch disease
  • Resource exports bring in a lot of foreign currency.
  • The home currency appreciates (becomes stronger).
  • Manufacturing and other exports become costlier abroad, so they shrink.
  • The country ends up depending on one commodity.

  • The name: manufacturing in the Netherlands weakened after gas was found in the North Sea area in the 1960s.

  • 2. Commodity price volatility

  • World prices for oil and minerals swing up and down.
  • Government revenue goes through boom and bust.

  • Spending plans then have to be cut suddenly.

  • 3. Rent seeking and corruption

  • Rent here means income that comes from owning a resource, not from producing anything.

  • Powerful groups (elites) fight to control this rent instead of building productive businesses.

  • 4. Conflict and weak institutions

  • The state earns from resources, so it does not need to tax its citizens.
  • Citizens who are not taxed have less power to hold the state to account.
  • So institutions (courts, parliament, auditors) stay weak.

Worked examples with numbers

  • Budget shock from price volatility:
  • Suppose oil gives 50% of government revenue.
  • The oil price falls 40%.

  • Revenue lost = 50% × 40% = about 20% of the budget, in one go.

  • Link to the Harrod-Domar model: growth rate g = s / v. Here s is the saving (investment) rate and v is the ICOR (incremental capital-output ratio, the extra capital needed to make one extra unit of output).

  • With s = 30% and v = 4, g = 30 / 4 = 7.5%.
  • Suppose resource money is spent on wasteful projects chosen through rent seeking, so v rises to 5. Then g falls to 6%.
  • The same saving now produces less growth. This is one way weak institutions turn resource wealth into slow growth.

What decides the outcome: institutions

  • Cursed countries:
  • Nigeria: oil wealth alongside poverty and conflict in the Niger Delta.

  • Venezuela: heavy dependence on oil, then collapse when oil prices fell.

  • Countries that escaped:

  • Norway: saves its oil income in a sovereign wealth fund (a state-owned investment fund).
    • The money stays out of the domestic economy, so there is less pressure on the currency and Dutch disease is limited.
    • Wealth is saved for future generations.

  • Botswana: good diamond governance. It has transparent contracts, and diamond revenue is invested in public services.

  • Lesson: the curse is not destiny. Institutions decide the outcome.

In India

  • The mineral-belt paradox: Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh hold huge mineral wealth (coal, iron ore, bauxite). Yet they have:
  • high poverty;

  • tribal displacement, where tribal people lose land and forest to mines.

  • This is a resource curse inside one country. The wealth leaves the district, but the pollution and displacement stay.

  • Policy response: District Mineral Foundation (DMF)
  • A DMF is a non-profit trust set up in every mining-affected district.
  • Law: the MMDR Amendment Act, 2015 (Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act).
  • Funding: mining lease holders pay a share of their royalty into the DMF. Royalty is the payment to the state for taking out its minerals.

  • Use: welfare of mining-affected people and areas, under PMKKKY (Pradhan Mantri Khanij Kshetra Kalyan Yojana).

  • Revised PMKKKY guidelines (January 2024):

  • At least 70% of funds must go to high-priority sectors: drinking water, environment and pollution control, health care, education, welfare of women and children, welfare of the aged and differently abled, skill development and livelihoods, sanitation and housing [1].

  • At least 70% must be spent in directly affected areas, and an audit is mandatory [1].

  • Latest figures (till November 2024): ₹1,02,083.03 crore had been collected in DMFs. Of this, ₹87,357.28 crore was sanctioned for 3.60 lakh projects [2].

  • Why DMF matters: it keeps part of the resource rent in the local area. This tackles the "wealth leaves, damage stays" problem at its root.

Don't confuse with

  • Dutch disease: this is only one channel of the resource curse. The currency appreciates and manufacturing shrinks. The resource curse is wider. It also includes price volatility, rent seeking, conflict and weak institutions.
  • Middle-income trap: this comes from the stage of development. A country's cheap-labour advantage fades before it can innovate. The term was coined by Gill and Kharas (2007). The resource curse comes from resource wealth, and it can hit a country at any income level.
  • Royalty vs DMF contribution: royalty is the payment to the state for extracting its minerals. The DMF contribution is a share of that royalty that goes into a district-level trust for mining-affected people.
  • Resource-rich but not cursed (Norway, Botswana): having resources does not by itself mean a country is cursed. The curse depends on governance, not on the resource.

Prelims Hooks

  • The resource curse is linked to Auty (1993) and Sachs-Warner (1995). Its other name is the paradox of plenty.
  • Dutch disease = resource exports make the currency rise, and manufacturing suffers. It is one of four channels of the curse. The others are price volatility, rent seeking and weak institutions.
  • Norway (sovereign wealth fund) and Botswana (diamonds) escaped the curse. Nigeria and Venezuela did not.
  • DMFs were created under the MMDR Amendment Act, 2015 and are funded by a share of royalty paid by mining lease holders.
  • Under the revised PMKKKY guidelines (2024), ≥ 70% of funds must go to high-priority sectors, and audit is mandatory [1].
  • Trap: the resource curse is not the same as the middle-income trap. The middle-income trap was coined by Gill and Kharas (2007).

Mains Points

  • The curse is about institutions: Norway and Botswana show that saving through a fund and running resources transparently can break the curse. India's mineral-belt states (Jharkhand, Odisha, Chhattisgarh) show the curse inside one country. DMF/PMKKKY is a fiscal fix (₹1.02 lakh crore collected by November 2024) [2]. But it works only with gram sabha participation, the 2024 rule of 70% spending in priority sectors and affected areas [1], and audits.
  • Federal and GS-II angle: mineral wealth, tribal rights (Fifth Schedule, PESA, Forest Rights Act) and local funds all meet here. Without inclusive governance, mining brings displacement and conflict, as with Left-Wing Extremism in the mineral belt. So growth policy must also be governance policy.
  • Growth and macro stability: relying on one commodity exposes the budget to boom and bust, and Dutch disease weakens manufacturing. Resource-rich regions need to diversify into manufacturing and skills. They also need to save windfall revenue instead of spending all of it during booms.

Related concepts

Read more

Sources

  1. 1Latest Guidelines of PMKKKY (PIB)pib.gov.in · tier 1
  2. 2District Mineral Foundation (DMF) (PIB)pib.gov.in · tier 1