Section 301 (US Trade Act, 1974)

Indian Economy glossary

FlashcardsQuick reviseKey facts. One by one.Start →

Also called: Section 301 · Topic: International Trade Policy, WTO and Intellectual Property · NCERT: Beyond NCERT

Meaning

Section 301 is a part of the US Trade Act, 1974. It lets the US Trade Representative (USTR), the US government's chief trade negotiator, investigate a foreign country's "unfair" trade practices. Examples are discrimination against US goods, or forced transfer of technology. If the USTR finds such a practice, it can hit back with tariffs (taxes on imports) or other trade curbs. This matters because the US acts alone under Section 301. It does not wait for a WTO dispute ruling. Critics therefore see it as a unilateral tool that skips the rule-based multilateral system.

Example

The US–China trade war began in 2018, when the US put Section 301 tariffs on Chinese goods. The two countries then raised tariffs against each other again and again. The war escalated sharply in 2025, with triple-digit tariff rates in April, before truces brought the rates down.

Don't confuse with

  • Section 232 (Trade Expansion Act, 1962): this allows tariffs on national-security grounds, not unfair trade. The US steel and aluminium tariffs of 2018 used Section 232. India retaliated in June 2019 with higher duties on 28 US products, including almonds, apples and walnuts.
  • Special 301 report: this is the USTR's yearly review of other countries' intellectual property protection. India sits on its "Priority Watch List", and the US cites India's Section 3(d) of the Patents Act and its compulsory licensing. It names and pressures countries, while a Section 301 action investigates and retaliates.

Recent developments

  • Feb 2026: The US Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that IEEPA (International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a 1977 emergency law) does not let the President impose tariffs. The US first used Section 122 of the Trade Act, 1974, which caps tariffs at 15% for 150 days. It then turned to Section 301. This makes Section 301 the main legal basis for US unilateral tariffs after the IEEPA route was closed.
  • July 2026: The USTR put an extra 10% Section 301 duty on Indian goods over forced-labour concerns, down from the 12.5% proposed in June. The cut came after India amended its Foreign Trade Policy to ban imports of goods made with forced labour. This shows Section 301 now covers labour standards, not just discrimination or technology transfer.
  • 2026 (India impact): About 55% of India's exports to the US pay the extra 10% duty. About 45%, including generic medicines and smartphones, are exempt. India is still engaged with the US in the Section 301 proceedings while it works to finish the India–US framework (interim) trade agreement. Removing this duty is now a bargaining point in those talks.
  • July 2026: Trade experts doubt that Section 301 tariffs would survive a court challenge. US courts could become a check on this tool, as they were on IEEPA tariffs.

Read more