·PIB·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEconomy

ASI 2024-25 reveals rising capital intensity alongside employment growth in registered manufacturing. Examine whether Indian manufacturing is becoming more labour-absorbing.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Evidence of rising labour absorption
  2. Limits to the claim
  3. Way forward

Labour absorption is the capacity of a sector to create jobs as it grows and invests. In ASI 2024-25, total fixed capital rose 10.54% and persons engaged rose 7.19% to about 2.10 crore [1]. Measured per worker, the data show that registered manufacturing is absorbing more labour, but only modestly.

Evidence of rising labour absorption

  • Capital per worker barely rose: fixed capital per person engaged went only from ₹23.61 lakh to ₹24.34 lakh, about 3% [2]. New investment went to more workers rather than replacing them.
  • Factories grew in machines and people together: persons engaged per factory rose from 92 to 96 [2].
  • Job growth picked up: employment grew 7.19%, up from 5.92% in 2023-24, even though GVA growth slowed from 11.89% to 9.59% [1][3]. This cuts against the "jobless growth" story.
  • Demand for labour is firm: emoluments rose 12.08%, faster than headcount [1].

Limits to the claim

  • Weak productivity: nominal GVA per person rose only about 2.2%. Growth came mostly from adding workers, not from each worker producing more.
  • Price effect: the growth figures are at current prices, so part of the rise is inflation.
  • Capital-heavy leaders: basic metals, motor vehicles, chemicals, pharmaceuticals and food products produce over 45% of GVA [1]. Labour-intensive sectors such as apparel and leather are not driving the growth.
  • Partial coverage: unincorporated manufacturing (ASUSE) employs about 3.4 crore workers, more than ASI factories [4].
  • Fragile series: one year is not a trend. The OSH Code, 2020 raises the factory threshold from 10/20 to 20/40 workers [5], which may break ASI's sampling frame.

Way forward

  • Direct PLI and MSME support towards labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, footwear and food processing.
  • Pair hiring with skilling and technology upgrades so that productivity rises along with jobs.
  • MoSPI could publish ASI on both the old and new factory definitions during the Labour Code transition, and connect ASI with ASUSE.

Overall, ASI 2024-25 suggests that capital deepening has not crowded out jobs, which is a welcome sign for a labour-surplus economy. For this to last, labour absorption must come with productivity gains and more labour-intensive industries. That is the path to the "decent work and economic growth" goal of SDG 8.

Sources

  1. 1MoSPI Press Note: Insights from ASI 2024-25GVA +9.59%, persons engaged +7.19% (2.10 crore), fixed capital +10.54%, emoluments +12.08%, top-five industries' GVA share
  2. 2MoSPI: Factsheet ASI 2024-25fixed capital per person engaged; persons engaged per factory
  3. 3PIB: Annual Survey of Industries (ASI) Results for 2023-242023-24 benchmark of GVA +11.89% and employment +5.92%
  4. 4MoSPI: Factsheet of ASUSE 2023-24about 3.4 crore workers in unincorporated manufacturing
  5. 5Ministry of Labour & Employment: FAQs on the OSH Code, 2020factory threshold raised from 10/20 to 20/40 workers
Practice
8 questions on this item
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity