Discuss the role of regional multilateral platforms in countering terrorism, with reference to India's co-chairship of the ADMM-Plus Experts' Working Group on Counter-Terrorism.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
Terrorist networks, money and fighters move across borders, so no single country can deal with terrorism alone. Regional platforms give countries a permanent table to work together. One example is the ASEAN-led ADMM-Plus, which brings together 11 ASEAN states and 8 Dialogue Partners, including India [1]. India's co-chairship of its Experts' Working Group on Counter-Terrorism (EWG-CT) shows both what such platforms can do and where they fall short.
Role of regional platforms in countering terrorism
- Building a common view of the threat: At ADMM-Plus in Bangkok (2019), India called for shutting terrorist safe havens, disrupting terror networks and funding, and acting against state-backed proxies [2].
- Work between ministerial meetings: Senior officials and seven Experts' Working Groups keep cooperation going between the annual ministers' meetings [3].
- A table open to all major powers: The US, China, Russia and Japan all sit at an ASEAN-chaired table [1]. Counter-terrorism work can therefore continue despite rivalry between them.
- Bilateral meetings on the sidelines: Ministers can strengthen defence ties with several partners during a single trip [1].
India's EWG-CT co-chairship (with Malaysia, 2024–27)
- Shaping the agenda: India helps set the regional counter-terrorism agenda at expert level [1][3]. Terrorism has been one of India's main themes at the forum since at least 2019 [2].
- Defence arm of Act East: The role adds a security pillar to ties that became a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership in 2022 [3].
- Security role beyond trade: India-ASEAN goods trade was USD 120.87 bn in FY 2023-24 [3]. The co-chairship shows India as a security partner, not only a trading one.
Limitations
- Few visible results: Official releases describe India's role but list no specific EWG-CT exercises or outputs [1][3].
- Competing priorities: The Philippines, which claims parts of the South China Sea, chairs ADMM-Plus in 2026 [1]. Maritime disputes may push counter-terrorism lower on the agenda.
- Speeches more than action: Ministerial statements mostly repeat principles. Platforms like this build trust and habits of cooperation, not binding rules.
Regional platforms add to national counter-terrorism efforts by turning a shared threat into regular, ongoing cooperation. India's co-chair term ends in 2027, and the Cebu meeting in 2026 is the last ministerial meeting before then [1]. India should use it to produce practical results, such as joint table-top exercises and information-sharing arrangements. This would match the Act East Policy's aim of an ASEAN-centred, rules-based regional order [3].
Sources
- 1Press Release: "Raksha Mantri to lead Indian delegation at 13th ADMM-Plus in Philippines", Ministry of Defence, 26 Oct 2026ADMM-Plus membership, 2026 Philippines chair and Cebu meeting, sideline bilateral meetings, EWG-CT co-chairship
- 2PIB: Raksha Mantri urges international community to eliminate scourge of terrorism at ADMM-Plus, Bangkok (2019)India's 2019 call on safe havens, terror financing and state-backed proxies
- 3MEA: Brief on India-ASEAN Relations (15 July 2025)seven EWGs, EWG-CT co-chairship with Malaysia, Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (2022), FY 2023-24 trade figure, ASEAN-centred security architecture