·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Discuss the strategic and economic significance of India's semiconductor manufacturing push. Evaluate the role of the India Semiconductor Mission in achieving self-reliance in electronics.

In this answer
  1. Strategic significance
  2. Economic significance
  3. ISM: achievements
  4. ISM: limitations

Semiconductors are, as the Prime Minister noted at the Semiconductor Executives' Roundtable, "the basis of the Digital Age" [1]. With chip imports of USD 23.5 billion in 2024 — the single largest item in India's electronics import bill — and a 0.02% share of world chip exports [5], domestic capability is now both an economic and a security necessity.

Strategic significance

  • Supply-chain de-risking: chips are dual-use (defence, telecom, AI hardware); the roundtable's participation by Micron, Rapidus, Tokyo Electron and Infineon [1] anchors India in the global "China+1" diversification.
  • Technology diplomacy: deepens India–US–Japan partnerships, with global majors seated alongside Indian firms like CG Power and Kaynes [1].

Economic significance

  • Import substitution and jobs across fabrication, ATMP/OSAT and design, supported by 50% fiscal support for fabs and packaging units [6].
  • Leveraging existing talent: about 20% of the world's chip-design engineers work in India [5].

ISM: achievements

  • Ten projects worth Rs 1.6 lakh crore approved by December 2025 [5]; the Design Linked Incentive scheme has backed 23 companies and 24 designs [5].
  • ISM 2.0 (Budget 2026-27, Rs 1,000 crore) correctly targets equipment, materials and full-stack Indian chip IP [5].

ISM: limitations

  • Weak utilisation — only 23% of funds used in 2023-24 and 9% in 2024-25 [5]; approvals are not yet output.
  • Low-value concentration — nine of ten projects are OSAT units, only one a foundry [5].
  • IP leakage — Indian design revenue stays under Rs 150 crore a year as IP vests abroad [5].
  • Cost disability — manufacturing costs run 14–18% above China's, with costlier credit and unreliable power [5]; India's ~USD 10 billion outlay is modest beside the US CHIPS Act's USD 53 billion for fabs [6].

ISM has credibly launched the ecosystem but not yet delivered self-reliance. Acting on NITI Aayog's call for a unified single-window clearance [5], enlarging DLI caps to retain IP, and tiered skilling can convert approvals into fabs — making Atmanirbhar Bharat in electronics a measured, achievable reality.

Sources

  1. 1PM chairs Semiconductor Executives' Roundtable, PIB"basis of the Digital Age"; participating global and Indian firms
  2. 5PRS Legislative Research, Demand for Grants 2026-27 Analysis: MeitY (March 2026)chip imports, export share, fund utilisation, 10 approved projects, DLI, design-engineer share and revenue, cost disability, ISM 2.0, NITI Aayog recommendations
  3. 6PRS Legislative Research, Policy Brief: Semiconductor Chip Manufacturing (March 2023)50% fiscal support for fabs and ATMP/OSAT; US CHIPS Act comparison

More from this note