·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsEconomyEnvironment

India's National Steel Policy targets a threefold rise in capacity, while its Green Steel Taxonomy signals a low-carbon transition. Can these two objectives be reconciled? Discuss with reference to recent government initiatives.

In this answer
  1. Why the tension is real
  2. How recent initiatives bridge the gap

The National Steel Policy, 2017 projects 300 MT crude steel capacity by 2030, up from 122 MT [1], even as India's steel sector emits about 12% of national CO2 at an intensity of ~2.55 t-CO2/tcs against a global average of ~1.85 [2]. Reconciliation is possible, but only if capacity addition and decarbonisation are sequenced together rather than pursued in succession.

Why the tension is real

  • Carbon lock-in: coal-based blast furnaces commissioned now run for 30–40 years, entrenching emissions well past India's net-zero-2070 horizon.
  • Route dependence: coal-based production dominates the Indian mix, and coking-coal import reliance remains high [1].
  • Cost gap: green hydrogen-DRI is not yet at cost parity, and steel demand from infrastructure and housing is price-sensitive.

How recent initiatives bridge the gap

  • Green Steel Taxonomy (12 Dec 2024) — world's first, defining greenness against a 2.2 t-CO2e/tfs threshold [3]; a standard, not a subsidy, enabling procurement and export certification amid EU CBAM-type measures.
  • "Greening the Steel Sector: Roadmap and Action Plan" (10 Sept 2024) — built on 14 Task Forces, covering energy efficiency, renewables, green hydrogen, coal-to-gas DRI transition, CCUS and biochar, aligned to net-zero 2070 [4].
  • Green hydrogen pilots — MNRE's scheme guidelines (2 Feb 2024) under the National Green Hydrogen Mission, with ₹455 crore till FY2029-30 for hydrogen use in DRI and blast furnaces [5].
  • Demand-side and technology levers — draft National Mission on Green Steel and Green Steel Public Procurement Policy, consulted alongside the taxonomy [3], plus proposed CCUS support for hard-to-abate sectors.

The objectives are complementary rather than contradictory: growth supplies the capital and scale that make low-carbon retrofits viable, while the taxonomy converts climate goals into a measurable market signal. The way forward lies in tying new capacity approvals to taxonomy thresholds, scaling scrap-based electric arc furnaces, and firming up the green steel mission and procurement policy — ensuring India's steel expansion advances, not undercuts, its NDC commitments.

Sources

  1. 1National Steel Policy (NSP), 2017 — Ministry of Steel300 MT capacity target by 2030 and coking-coal import-dependence reduction goal
  2. 2Year-end Review, Ministry of Steel, PIBsteel sector's ~12% share of India's CO2 emissions; intensity 2.55 vs global 1.85 t-CO2/tcs
  3. 3Union Minister of Steel Releases India's Green Steel Taxonomy, PIB (12 Dec 2024)world-first taxonomy, 2.2 t-CO2e/tfs threshold; draft National Mission on Green Steel and Green Steel Public Procurement Policy consultations
  4. 4Ministry of Steel, "Greening Steel: Pathway to Sustainability" / Roadmap and Action Plan, PIB (10 Sept 2024)14 Task Forces; decarbonisation levers including CCUS, green hydrogen, biochar; net-zero 2070 alignment
  5. 5Scheme Guidelines for Pilot Projects for Use of Green Hydrogen in Steel Sector under NGHM, MNRE (2 Feb 2024)₹455 crore till FY2029-30; hydrogen in DRI and blast furnace routes
Practice
10 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Economy