·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsEconomyEnvironment

Examine the role of green hydrogen in decarbonising India's hard-to-abate industries. What are the key supply-side and cost challenges?

In this answer
  1. Role in decarbonisation
  2. Supply-side challenges
  3. Cost challenges

Hard-to-abate industries — steel, cement, refining and fertilisers — resist direct electrification because they need very high-temperature heat and carbon as a chemical reductant. Green hydrogen, produced by electrolysis of water using renewable power, is the principal substitute India is betting on, though it remains at pilot scale.

Role in decarbonisation

  • Feedstock substitution: hydrogen replaces coking coal in reducing iron ore. MNRE's pilot guidelines (2 February 2024) fund 100% hydrogen-based DRI in vertical shafts and hydrogen injection in blast furnaces, with ₹455 crore till FY2029-30 [2].
  • Mission scale: the National Green Hydrogen Mission (approved January 2023, outlay ₹19,744 crore) targets 5 MMT per annum by 2030, expected to avert nearly 50 MMT of CO2 annually [1].
  • One of several levers: the Ministry of Steel's Greening the Steel Sector: Roadmap and Action Plan, based on 14 Task Forces, places green hydrogen alongside energy efficiency, renewables, material efficiency and CCUS [3].
  • Refineries and fertiliser units can displace grey hydrogen immediately, offering the cheapest early demand [1].
  • Demand pull: India's Green Steel Taxonomy (December 2024) — the world's first — defines green steel below 2.2 tCO2e per tonne, enabling green public procurement and export certification [4].

Supply-side challenges

  • Producing 5 MMT requires about 125 GW of additional renewable capacity, raising land, grid-integration and round-the-clock supply problems for continuously-run plants [1].
  • Domestic electrolyser manufacturing is nascent, addressed only through SIGHT incentives; critical-mineral dependence persists [1].
  • No dedicated hydrogen storage, pipeline or transport network; deployment is still a handful of pilots [2].

Cost challenges

  • Green hydrogen remains costlier than coal-based routes; cost reduction is an explicit government priority [5].
  • The resulting "green premium" on steel demands procurement mandates and PLI-type support for offtake [4].
  • Retrofitting or replacing recently-built blast furnaces risks stranded assets [3].

Green hydrogen is therefore necessary but not sufficient. Sequencing it with energy efficiency, scrap-based electric arc furnaces and CCUS, while scaling renewables and electrolysers, can align industrial growth with India's net-zero-by-2070 pledge.

Sources

  1. 1Cabinet approves National Green Hydrogen Mission, PIB (4 January 2023)5 MMT by 2030, ₹19,744 crore outlay, 125 GW renewable addition, 50 MMT CO2 averted, SIGHT electrolyser incentives
  2. 2Government issues Pilot Project Guidelines for utilizing Green Hydrogen in Steel Sector, PIBMNRE guidelines of 2 February 2024, ₹455 crore till FY2029-30, hydrogen-DRI and blast-furnace thrust areas
  3. 3Ministry of Steel hosts 'Greening Steel: Pathway to Sustainability', PIB (10 September 2024)Roadmap and Action Plan, 14 Task Forces, decarbonisation levers
  4. 4Union Minister of Steel Releases India's Green Steel Taxonomy, PIB (12 December 2024)first such taxonomy globally, 2.2 tCO2e/tonne threshold, draft green steel public procurement policy
  5. 5Government Highlights Progress Under National Green Hydrogen Mission to Reduce Green Hydrogen Costs, PIBcost of green hydrogen as the binding constraint
Practice
10 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Economy